Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 175

1.

Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications.

Kohr JR, Eby PR, Allison KH, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Peacock S, Lehman CD.

Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):723-30. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091406. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

PMID:
20173103
2.

Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge.

Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jan;192(1):229-34. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1342.

PMID:
19098204
3.

Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP.

Radiology. 1998 Jul;208(1):251-60.

PMID:
9646821
4.

Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?

McLaughlin CT, Neal CH, Helvie MA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):917-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11862.

PMID:
25247961
5.

Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy.

Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Van Zee KJ, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD.

Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):673-7.

PMID:
9169687
6.

Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?

Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3232-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0100-2. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

PMID:
18696163
7.

Identifying patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at core-needle biopsy who are at low risk of malignancy.

Albarracin CT, Nguyen CV, Whitman GJ, Yang W, Sneige N.

Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):893-4; author reply 984. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101253. No abstract available. Erratum in: Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):962. Weiang, Wei [corrected to Yang, Wei].

PMID:
21084420
8.
9.

Vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia and patient management.

Ancona A, Capodieci M, Galiano A, Mangieri F, Lorusso V, Gatta G.

Radiol Med. 2011 Mar;116(2):276-91. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0626-9. Epub 2011 Jan 12. English, Italian.

PMID:
21225358
10.

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found calcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures.

Penco S, Rizzo S, Bozzini AC, Latronico A, Menna S, Cassano E, Bellomi M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1255-60. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4208.

PMID:
20966337
11.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Considerations for surgical excision.

Sneige N, Lim SC, Whitman GJ, Krishnamurthy S, Sahin AA, Smith TL, Stelling CB.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Feb;119(2):248-53.

PMID:
12579995
12.

Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Lazarus E, Giri D, Schepps B.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):W275-9.

PMID:
17954625
13.

Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs.

Margolin FR, Kaufman L, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD.

Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):251-4. Epub 2004 Aug 27.

PMID:
15333764
14.

Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting.

Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA, Simpson JF, Page DL.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Aug;25(8):1017-21.

PMID:
11474285
15.

Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Schiaffino S, Massone E, Gristina L, Fregatti P, Rescinito G, Villa A, Friedman D, Calabrese M.

Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20180003. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180003. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

PMID:
29451396
16.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade.

Allison KH, Eby PR, Kohr J, DeMartini WB, Lehman CD.

Hum Pathol. 2011 Jan;42(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

PMID:
20970167
17.

Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.

Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg WA, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Page DL, McNeil BJ; Radiologist Investigators of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V.

Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):293-308.

PMID:
15035520
18.

Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy.

Jeffries DO, Neal CH, Noroozian M, Joe AI, Pinsky RW, Goodsitt MM, Helvie MA.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Dec;154(3):557-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3640-8. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

PMID:
26589316
19.

Flat epithelial atypia: comparison between 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices.

Villa A, Chiesa F, Massa T, Friedman D, Canavese G, Baccini P, Calabrese M, Tagliafico A.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Dec;13(6):450-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

PMID:
24094905
20.

Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Borgen PI.

Radiology. 1998 Mar;206(3):711-5.

PMID:
9494489

Supplemental Content

Support Center