Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 178

1.

Optimized MRI contrast for on-resonance proton exchange processes of PARACEST agents in biological systems.

Li AX, Suchy M, Jones CK, Hudson RH, Menon RS, Bartha R.

Magn Reson Med. 2009 Nov;62(5):1282-91. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22134.

2.

Four-pool modeling of proton exchange processes in biological systems in the presence of MRI-paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) agents.

Li AX, Hudson RH, Barrett JW, Jones CK, Pasternak SH, Bartha R.

Magn Reson Med. 2008 Nov;60(5):1197-206. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21752.

3.

In vivo detection of MRI-PARACEST agents in mouse brain tumors at 9.4 T.

Li AX, Suchy M, Li C, Gati JS, Meakin S, Hudson RH, Menon RS, Bartha R.

Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jul;66(1):67-72. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22772. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

4.
5.

In vivo detection of PARACEST agents with relaxation correction.

Jones CK, Li AX, Suchý M, Hudson RH, Menon RS, Bartha R.

Magn Reson Med. 2010 May;63(5):1184-92. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22340.

6.

Quantitative Bayesian model-based analysis of amide proton transfer MRI.

Chappell MA, Donahue MJ, Tee YK, Khrapitchev AA, Sibson NR, Jezzard P, Payne SJ.

Magn Reson Med. 2013 Aug;70(2):556-67. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24474. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

PMID:
23008121
7.

Magnetic resonance chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging and nanotechnology.

Winter PM.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2012 Jul-Aug;4(4):389-98. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1167. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Review.

PMID:
22422650
8.

A review of optimization and quantification techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI toward sensitive in vivo imaging.

Kim J, Wu Y, Guo Y, Zheng H, Sun PZ.

Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2015 May-Jun;10(3):163-178. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1628. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Review.

9.

SWIFT-CEST: a new MRI method to overcome T₂ shortening caused by PARACEST contrast agents.

Soesbe TC, Togao O, Takahashi M, Sherry AD.

Magn Reson Med. 2012 Sep;68(3):816-21. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23302. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

10.

In vivo imaging of paraCEST agents using frequency labeled exchange transfer MRI.

Lin CY, Yadav NN, Ratnakar J, Sherry AD, van Zijl PC.

Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jan;71(1):286-93. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24603. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

11.

Fast simulation and optimization of pulse-train chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging.

Xiao G, Sun PZ, Wu R.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jun 21;60(12):4719-30. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/12/4719. Epub 2015 May 28.

12.

Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI.

Woessner DE, Zhang S, Merritt ME, Sherry AD.

Magn Reson Med. 2005 Apr;53(4):790-9.

13.
14.

A sensitive PARACEST contrast agent for temperature MRI: Eu3+-DOTAM-glycine (Gly)-phenylalanine (Phe).

Li AX, Wojciechowski F, Suchy M, Jones CK, Hudson RH, Menon RS, Bartha R.

Magn Reson Med. 2008 Feb;59(2):374-81. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21482.

15.

Variable delay multi-pulse train for fast chemical exchange saturation transfer and relayed-nuclear overhauser enhancement MRI.

Xu J, Yadav NN, Bar-Shir A, Jones CK, Chan KW, Zhang J, Walczak P, McMahon MT, van Zijl PC.

Magn Reson Med. 2014 May;71(5):1798-812. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24850. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

16.

Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra.

Zaiss M, Schmitt B, Bachert P.

J Magn Reson. 2011 Aug;211(2):149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 15.

PMID:
21641247
19.
20.

In vivo three-dimensional whole-brain pulsed steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T.

Jones CK, Polders D, Hua J, Zhu H, Hoogduin HJ, Zhou J, Luijten P, van Zijl PC.

Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jun;67(6):1579-89. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23141. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

Supplemental Content

Support Center