Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 157

1.

Return to sender hospital readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Kereiakes DJ.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 1;54(10):908-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.037. No abstract available.

2.

All-cause readmission and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients.

Curtis JP, Schreiner G, Wang Y, Chen J, Spertus JA, Rumsfeld JS, Brindis RG, Krumholz HM.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 1;54(10):903-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.076.

3.

The effect of managed care penetration on the treatment of AMI in the fee-for-service Medicare population.

Bradford WD, Krumholz HM.

Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2002 Nov;2(4):265-83. No abstract available.

PMID:
14625994
4.

Physician practice size and variations in treatments and outcomes: evidence from Medicare patients with AMI.

Ketcham JD, Baker LC, MacIsaac D.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):195-205.

5.
6.

[Utilization of heart catheter in Germany. Used too often in stable coronary heart disease, too seldom in myocardial infarct].

Bischoff A.

MMW Fortschr Med. 2008 Mar 6;150(10):18-9. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
18447284
7.

Prognostic impact of hospital readmissions after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Campo G, Saia F, Guastaroba P, Marchesini J, Varani E, Manari A, Ottani F, Tondi S, De Palma R, Marzocchi A.

Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 28;171(21):1948-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.536. No abstract available.

PMID:
22123806
8.

Evidence-based medical therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Jaber WA, Rihal CS.

Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Jun;10(2):79-80. No abstract available.

PMID:
16753499
9.

Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

Straube BM, McGann PE, Rapp MT.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):311; author reply 312. No abstract available.

PMID:
19610165
10.

Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

Rackow EC.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):311; author reply 312. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc090911. No abstract available.

11.

To rescue or not?

Goyal BK.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 1;71(2):146. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21488. No abstract available.

PMID:
18231991
12.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention without cardiac surgery on-site: coming to a hospital near you?

Jacobs AK.

Am Heart J. 2008 Apr;155(4):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.024. No abstract available.

PMID:
18371462
13.

Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

Rohr R.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):311-2; author reply 312. No abstract available.

PMID:
19610166
14.

Cystatin C in a high-risk combination.

Iwanaga Y, Miyazaki S.

Circ J. 2009 Sep;73(9):1593-4. No abstract available.

15.
16.

Frequency of gross hematuria shortly after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Sanchez PL, Rubenstein MH, Harrell LC, Colon-Hernandez PJ, Choo JK, Palacios IF.

Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jul 1;88(1):A7, 71-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
11423063
17.

Angioplasty: practice makes "better".

[No authors listed]

Harv Heart Lett. 1999 Jun;9(10):3-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
10233787
18.

Another CTO conundrum: important questions remain.

Ramsdale DR, Aziz S.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Jan;18(1):20. No abstract available.

PMID:
16391379
20.

A critical appraisal of current models of risk stratification for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Singh M, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, Garratt KN, Holmes DR Jr.

Am Heart J. 2005 May;149(5):753-60. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
15894953
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center