Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 707

1.

Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?

Woods J, Woods CA, Fonn D.

Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Sep;35(5):221-6. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181b5003b.

PMID:
19675462
2.

Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.

Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K.

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 May;83(5):266-73.

PMID:
16699438
3.

Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.

Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5.

PMID:
16909087
4.

Visual Performance of a Multifocal Contact Lens versus Monovision in Established Presbyopes.

Woods J, Woods C, Fonn D.

Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Feb;92(2):175-82. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000476.

PMID:
25525891
5.

Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.

Gupta N, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS.

Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;86(2):E98-105. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318194eb18.

PMID:
19156009
6.

Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.

Sivardeen A, Laughton D, Wolffsohn JS.

Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;93(2):141-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000780.

PMID:
26704141
7.

Myopic astigmatism and presbyopia trial.

Savage H, Rothstein M, Davuluri G, El Ghormli L, Zaetta DM.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 May;135(5):628-32.

PMID:
12719069
8.
9.
10.

Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.

Dillehay SM, Miller MB.

Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 1):272-7.

PMID:
17993820
11.

Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.

Sha J, Bakaraju RC, Tilia D, Chung J, Delaney S, Munro A, Ehrmann K, Thomas V, Holden BA.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 Apr;79(2):73-7. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160023.

12.

The effect of presbyopic vision corrections on nighttime driving performance.

Chu BS, Wood JM, Collins MJ.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Sep;51(9):4861-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5154. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

PMID:
20375338
13.

Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.

Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D.

Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Jul;34(4):215-23. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31816499dc.

PMID:
18787429
14.

Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.

García-Lázaro S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Radhakrishnan H, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1022-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da324.

PMID:
22729169
15.

Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.

Efron S, Efron N, Morgan PB.

Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Mar;85(3):201-10. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318165100a.

PMID:
18317336
16.

Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.

Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Efron N, Efron S.

Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82(6):536-48.

PMID:
15976592
17.

Clinical investigation of asmofilcon a silicone hydrogel lenses.

Lakkis C, Vincent S.

Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;86(4):350-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819b385c.

PMID:
19258913
18.

Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.

García-Lázaro S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R.

Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Jan;41(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000060.

PMID:
25230076
19.

Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear.

Lakkis C, Goldenberg SA, Woods CA.

Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;82(12):1022-9.

PMID:
16357643
20.

Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.

Situ P, Du Toit R, Fonn D, Simpson T.

Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jul;29(3):181-4.

PMID:
12861114

Supplemental Content

Support Center