Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 169

1.

Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Conti M, Jakoby BW, Lois C, Townsend DW.

J Nucl Med. 2009 Aug;50(8):1315-23. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063016. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

2.

Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.

El Fakhri G, Surti S, Trott CM, Scheuermann J, Karp JS.

J Nucl Med. 2011 Mar;52(3):347-53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.080382. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

3.

Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.

Morey AM, Kadrmas DJ.

J Nucl Med Technol. 2013 Dec;41(4):268-73. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.113.131904. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

4.

Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Black NF, Hamill JJ, Panin VY, Conti M.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Apr;28(4):523-34. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2006520. Epub 2008 Oct 3.

5.

Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.

Surti S, Scheuermann J, El Fakhri G, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Lim R, Abi-Hatem N, Moussallem E, Benard F, Mankoff D, Karp JS.

J Nucl Med. 2011 May;52(5):712-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086678. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

6.

Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.

Teoh EJ, McGowan DR, Macpherson RE, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV.

J Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;56(9):1447-52. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159301. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

7.

Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.

Akamatsu G, Ishikawa K, Mitsumoto K, Taniguchi T, Ohya N, Baba S, Abe K, Sasaki M.

J Nucl Med. 2012 Nov;53(11):1716-22. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103861. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

8.

Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.

Lartizien C, Kinahan PE, Swensson R, Comtat C, Lin M, Villemagne V, Trébossen R.

J Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;44(2):276-90.

9.

Effect of Using 2mm Voxels on Observer Performance for PET Lesion Detection.

Morey AM, Noo F, Kadrmas DJ.

IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2016 Jun;63(3):1359-1366. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

10.

Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for 18F-FDG cardiac PET: A multi-center phantom study.

Matheoud R, Lecchi M, Lizio D, Scabbio C, Marcassa C, Leva L, Del Sole A, Rodella C, Indovina L, Bracco C, Brambilla M, Zoccarato O.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(3):1036-1045. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0385-z. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Erratum in: J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jan 25;:.

PMID:
26758376
11.

Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Kadrmas DJ, Oktay MB, Casey ME, Hamill JJ.

IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2012 Oct;59(5):1940-1947.

12.

Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Karp JS, Surti S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Muehllehner G.

J Nucl Med. 2008 Mar;49(3):462-70. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044834. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

13.

Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.

Andersen FL, Klausen TL, Loft A, Beyer T, Holm S.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 May;82(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.015. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

PMID:
23254158
14.

Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.

Shang K, Cui B, Ma J, Shuai D, Liang Z, Jansen F, Zhou Y, Lu J, Zhao G.

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Aug;93:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 May 25.

PMID:
28668434
15.

Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.

Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC.

Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5394-411. doi: 10.1118/1.3635220.

PMID:
21992359
16.

Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.

Taniguchi T, Akamatsu G, Kasahara Y, Mitsumoto K, Baba S, Tsutsui Y, Himuro K, Mikasa S, Kidera D, Sasaki M.

Ann Nucl Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s12149-014-0912-z. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

17.

4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.

Lorsakul A, Li Q, Trott CM, Hoog C, Petibon Y, Ouyang J, Laine AF, El Fakhri G.

Med Phys. 2014 Oct;41(10):102504. doi: 10.1118/1.4895975.

18.

Validation of fast-RAMLA in clinical PET.

Sato H, Cho K, Fukushima Y, Shiiba M, Hakozaki K, Kiriyama T, Sakurai M, Kanaya K, Kumita S.

Ann Nucl Med. 2008 Dec;22(10):869-76. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0196-2. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

PMID:
19142705
19.

Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.

Akamatsu G, Mitsumoto K, Taniguchi T, Tsutsui Y, Baba S, Sasaki M.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jan;83(1):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 6.

PMID:
24144448
20.

Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.

Quak E, Le Roux PY, Hofman MS, Robin P, Bourhis D, Callahan J, Binns D, Desmonts C, Salaun PY, Hicks RJ, Aide N.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(13):2072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3128-0. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

Supplemental Content

Support Center