Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 89

1.

Phylogenetic support values are not necessarily informative: the case of the Serialia hypothesis (a mollusk phylogeny).

Wägele JW, Letsch H, Klussmann-Kolb A, Mayer C, Misof B, Wägele H.

Front Zool. 2009 Jun 26;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-12.

3.

Mosaics of convergences and noise in morphological phylogenies: what's in a viverrid-like carnivoran?

Gaubert P, Wozencraft WC, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Veron G.

Syst Biol. 2005 Dec;54(6):865-94.

PMID:
16282167
4.

Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

von Reumont BM, Meusemann K, Szucsich NU, Dell'Ampio E, Gowri-Shankar V, Bartel D, Simon S, Letsch HO, Stocsits RR, Luan YX, Wägele JW, Pass G, Hadrys H, Misof B.

BMC Evol Biol. 2009 May 27;9:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-119.

5.

Identification of shared single copy nuclear genes in Arabidopsis, Populus, Vitis and Oryza and their phylogenetic utility across various taxonomic levels.

Duarte JM, Wall PK, Edger PP, Landherr LL, Ma H, Pires JC, Leebens-Mack J, dePamphilis CW.

BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Feb 24;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-61.

6.

Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades.

Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Grishin NV, Tatusov RL, Koonin EV.

BMC Evol Biol. 2001 Oct 20;1:8.

7.
8.

Quartet decomposition server: a platform for analyzing phylogenetic trees.

Mao F, Williams D, Zhaxybayeva O, Poptsova M, Lapierre P, Gogarten JP, Xu Y.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 7;13:123.

9.

Effects of sequence alignment and structural domains of ribosomal DNA on phylogeny reconstruction for the protozoan family sarcocystidae.

Mugridge NB, Morrison DA, Jäkel T, Heckeroth AR, Tenter AM, Johnson AM.

Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Dec;17(12):1842-53.

PMID:
11110900
10.

Assessing the molluscan hypothesis Serialia (Monoplacophora+Polyplacophora) using novel molecular data.

Wilson NG, Rouse GW, Giribet G.

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Jan;54(1):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.028. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

PMID:
19647088
11.

Phylogeny of iguanian lizards inferred from 29 nuclear loci, and a comparison of concatenated and species-tree approaches for an ancient, rapid radiation.

Townsend TM, Mulcahy DG, Noonan BP, Sites JW Jr, Kuczynski CA, Wiens JJ, Reeder TW.

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Nov;61(2):363-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

PMID:
21787873
12.

Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.

García-Pereira MJ, Caballero A, Quesada H.

Mol Biol Evol. 2010 May;27(5):988-1000. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp315. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

PMID:
20026482
13.
15.

Monophyly of clade III nematodes is not supported by phylogenetic analysis of complete mitochondrial genome sequences.

Park JK, Sultana T, Lee SH, Kang S, Kim HK, Min GS, Eom KS, Nadler SA.

BMC Genomics. 2011 Aug 3;12:392. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-392.

16.

Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data.

Rubin BE, Ree RH, Moreau CS.

PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033394. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

17.

Universal artifacts affect the branching of phylogenetic trees, not universal scaling laws.

Altaba CR.

PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004611. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

18.

Using supermatrices for phylogenetic inquiry: an example using the sedges.

Hinchliff CE, Roalson EH.

Syst Biol. 2013 Mar;62(2):205-19. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys088. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

PMID:
23103590
19.

Supplemental Content

Support Center