Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 127

1.

Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S, Jackson R, Richter HE, Chan J, Kuppermann M.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;113(6):1259-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a66c42. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):696-7.

2.

Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222.

3.

Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.

Price JT, Zimmerman LD, Koelper NC, Sammel MD, Lee S, Butts SF.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):572.e1-572.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.036. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

PMID:
28784416
4.

Trends in bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease.

Novetsky AP, Boyd LR, Curtin JP.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;118(6):1280-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236fe61.

PMID:
22105256
6.

Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010.

Lee J, Jennings K, Borahay MA, Rodriguez AM, Kilic GS, Snyder RR, Patel PR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

7.

National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011.

Mikhail E, Salemi JL, Mogos MF, Hart S, Salihu HM, Imudia AN.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):713.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.031. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

PMID:
25935772
8.

Trends in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among Taiwanese women undergoing benign hysterectomy: a population-based, pooled, cross-sectional study.

Lai JC, Huang N, Wang KL, Hu HY, Chen IT, Chou YJ.

Menopause. 2015 Jul;22(7):765-72. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000360.

PMID:
25387346
9.

Effects of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy on pelvic organ prolapse: results from the Women's Health Initiative trial.

Shveiky D, Kudish BI, Iglesia CB, Park AJ, Sokol AI, Lehman AM, Shara N, Howard BV.

Menopause. 2015 May;22(5):483-8. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000375.

PMID:
25423323
11.

Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.

Mehta A, Xu T, Hutfless S, Makary MA, Sinno AK, Tanner EJ 3rd, Stone RL, Wang K, Fader AN.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):497.e1-497.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

12.

Potential adverse effects of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on skin aging in premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Töz E, Özcan A, Balsak D, Avc ME, Eraslan AG, Balc DD.

Menopause. 2016 Feb;23(2):138-42. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000511.

PMID:
26382316
13.

Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Variations by History of Military Service and Birth Cohort.

Callegari LS, Gray KE, Zephyrin LC, Harrington LB, Gerber MR, Cochrane BB, Weitlauf JC, Bean-Mayberry B, Bastian LA, Mattocks KM, Haskell SG, Katon JG.

Gerontologist. 2016 Feb;56 Suppl 1:S67-77. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv666.

PMID:
26768393
14.

Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy compared with surveillance in women with BRCA mutations.

Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, White KG, Soliman PT, Uyei AR, Erlichman JL, Arun BK, Daniels MS, Rimes SA, Peterson SK, Slomovitz BM, Milam MR, Gershenson DM, Lu KH.

Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):515-20.

PMID:
16946209
15.

Disparities in use of laparoscopic hysterectomies: a nationwide analysis.

Patel PR, Lee J, Rodriguez AM, Borahay MA, Snyder RR, Hankins GD, Kilic GS.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.709. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

16.

Removal of normal ovaries in women under age 51 at the time of hysterectomy.

Karp NE, Fenner DE, Burgunder-Zdravkovski L, Morgan DM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):716.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.062. Epub 2015 May 29.

PMID:
26032038
17.

Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.

Evans EC, Matteson KA, Orejuela FJ, Alperin M, Balk EM, El-Nashar S, Gleason JL, Grimes C, Jeppson P, Mathews C, Wheeler TL, Murphy M; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):476-85. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001592. Review.

18.

Elective oophorectomy in the United States: trends and in-hospital complications, 1998-2006.

Asante A, Whiteman MK, Kulkarni A, Cox S, Marchbanks PA, Jamieson DJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1088-95. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f5ec9d.

PMID:
20966693
19.

Factors affecting prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women.

Gross CP, Nicholson W, Powe NR.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;94(6):962-8.

PMID:
10576183
20.

Factors affecting the feasibility of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse.

Dain L, Abramov Y.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;51(4):307-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01323.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

PMID:
21806584

Supplemental Content

Support Center