Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 131

1.

Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis.

Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveira LB, Bezerra AC, Bönecker M.

Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Mar;10(1):41-6.

PMID:
19364244
2.

Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.

Mickenautsch S, Tyas MJ, Yengopal V, Oliveira LB, Bönecker M.

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010 Sep;18(3):139-45. Review.

PMID:
21077424
3.

Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT.

Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Feb;62(1):37-45.

PMID:
15124781
4.

Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.

Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG.

Am J Dent. 1997 Oct;10(5):247-50.

PMID:
9522700
5.

Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.

Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers PT.

J Dent. 2004 May;32(4):285-94.

PMID:
15053911
6.
7.

Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.

Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R.

J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):185-94.

PMID:
11570687
8.

Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.

Daou MH, Tavernier B, Meyer JM.

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Fall;34(1):53-8.

PMID:
19953810
9.

Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.

Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.

Pediatr Dent. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):245-50.

PMID:
15185806
10.
11.

Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.

Hickel R, Manhart J, García-Godoy F.

Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):41D-54D.

PMID:
11763918
12.

Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.

Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.

Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):251-8.

PMID:
11203827
15.

Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Foley J, Evans D, Blackwell A.

Br Dent J. 2004 Dec 11;197(11):697-701; discussion 689.

PMID:
15592552
16.

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.

Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A.

Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0335-8. Epub 2009 Aug 18. Review.

PMID:
19688227
17.

Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.

Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Barbosa SH, Lauris JR, Franco EB.

J Public Health Dent. 2003 Fall;63(4):221-6.

PMID:
14682645
18.

Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.

Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E.

ASDC J Dent Child. 2002 Jan-Apr;69(1):16-26, 11.

PMID:
12119808
19.

Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.

Dutta BN, Gauba K, Tewari A, Chawla HS.

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2001 Sep;19(3):118-22.

PMID:
11817797
20.

Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years.

Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ.

J Dent. 1995 Aug;23(4):213-5.

PMID:
7629325

Supplemental Content

Support Center