Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 159

1.

Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Black NF, Hamill JJ, Panin VY, Conti M.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Apr;28(4):523-34. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2006520. Epub 2008 Oct 3.

2.

Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.

Morey AM, Kadrmas DJ.

J Nucl Med Technol. 2013 Dec;41(4):268-73. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.113.131904. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

3.

Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.

Lartizien C, Kinahan PE, Swensson R, Comtat C, Lin M, Villemagne V, Trébossen R.

J Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;44(2):276-90.

4.

Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Conti M, Jakoby BW, Lois C, Townsend DW.

J Nucl Med. 2009 Aug;50(8):1315-23. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063016. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

5.

4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.

Lorsakul A, Li Q, Trott CM, Hoog C, Petibon Y, Ouyang J, Laine AF, El Fakhri G.

Med Phys. 2014 Oct;41(10):102504. doi: 10.1118/1.4895975.

6.

Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.

El Fakhri G, Santos PA, Badawi RD, Holdsworth CH, Van Den Abbeele AD, Kijewski MF.

J Nucl Med. 2007 Dec;48(12):1951-60. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

7.
8.

Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.

Surti S, Scheuermann J, El Fakhri G, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Lim R, Abi-Hatem N, Moussallem E, Benard F, Mankoff D, Karp JS.

J Nucl Med. 2011 May;52(5):712-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086678. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

9.

Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.

Leng S, Yu L, Zhang Y, Carter R, Toledano AY, McCollough CH.

Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):081908. doi: 10.1118/1.4812430.

10.

Effect of attenuation correction on lesion detection using a hybrid PET system.

Tocharoenchai C, Tsui BM, Frey EC, Wang WT.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jan;88(1):96-102.

PMID:
15960226
11.

Assessment of scatter compensation strategies for (67)Ga SPECT using numerical observers and human LROC studies.

Farncombe TH, Gifford HC, Narayanan MV, Pretorius PH, Frey EC, King MA.

J Nucl Med. 2004 May;45(5):802-12.

12.

ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm.

Farquhar TH, Llacer J, Hoh CK, Czernin J, Gambhir SS, Seltzer MA, Silverman DH, Qi J, Hsu C, Hoffman EJ.

J Nucl Med. 1999 Dec;40(12):2043-52.

13.

Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Kadrmas DJ, Oktay MB, Casey ME, Hamill JJ.

IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2012 Oct;59(5):1940-1947.

14.

Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE+OSEM for PET.

Liu X, Comtat C, Michel C, Kinahan P, Defrise M, Townsend D.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Aug;20(8):804-14.

PMID:
11513031
15.

Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.

Tong S, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE.

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 7;55(5):1453-73. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/013. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

16.

Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.

Teoh EJ, McGowan DR, Macpherson RE, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV.

J Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;56(9):1447-52. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159301. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

17.

Impact on reader performance for lesion-detection/ localization tasks of anatomical priors in SPECT reconstruction.

Lehovich A, Bruyant PP, Gifford HS, Schneider PB, Squires S, Licho R, Gindi G, King MA.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Sep;28(9):1459-67. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2017741. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

18.

Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.

Petibon Y, Huang C, Ouyang J, Reese TG, Li Q, Syrkina A, Chen YL, El Fakhri G.

Med Phys. 2014 Apr;41(4):042503. doi: 10.1118/1.4868458.

19.

ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.

Farquhar TH, Llacer J, Sayre J, Tai YC, Hoffman EJ.

J Nucl Med. 2000 Apr;41(4):745-54.

20.

Effect of Using 2mm Voxels on Observer Performance for PET Lesion Detection.

Morey AM, Noo F, Kadrmas DJ.

IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2016 Jun;63(3):1359-1366. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

Supplemental Content

Support Center