Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 251

1.

The use of core biopsy imprint cytology in the 'one-stop' breast clinic.

Kulkarni D, Irvine T, Reyes RJ.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;35(10):1037-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

PMID:
19268520
2.

Imprint cytology of needle core-biopsy specimens of breast lesion: is it best of both worlds?

Carmichael AR, Berresford A, Sami A, Boparai R.

Breast. 2004 Jun;13(3):232-4.

PMID:
15177427
3.

[Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].

Kocjan G.

Acta Med Croatica. 2008 Oct;62(4):391-401. Review. Croatian.

PMID:
19205416
4.
6.

Touch imprint cytology of core needle biopsy specimens: a useful method for immediate reporting of symptomatic breast lesions.

Klevesath MB, Godwin RJ, Bannon R, Munthali L, Coveney E.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun;31(5):490-4.

PMID:
15922884
7.

Imprint cytology of needle core-biopsy specimens of breast lesions: is it a useful adjunt to rapid assessment breast clinics?

Qureshi NA, Beresford A, Sami S, Boparai R, Gosh S, Carmichael AR.

Breast. 2007 Feb;16(1):81-5. Epub 2006 Sep 6.

PMID:
16952454
8.
9.

[Clinical experience with percutaneus large-core needle biopsies of the breast and evaluation of cytopathological and histopathological results].

Anlauf M, Nicklaus S, Rode G, Jäckel C, Neumann K, Kalbfleisch H, Mühlberger G.

Zentralbl Gynakol. 2003 Sep;125(9):353-61. German.

PMID:
14569517
10.

A prospective study of the use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Dennison G, Anand R, Makar SH, Pain JA.

Breast J. 2003 Nov-Dec;9(6):491-3.

PMID:
14616944
11.

Imprint cytology from core biopsies increases the sensitivity of fine needle aspiration (FNA) in breast cancer patients.

Dayal S, Murray J, Wilson K, Lannigan A.

Magy Seb. 2011 Apr;64(2):59-62. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.64.2011.2.1.

PMID:
21504853
12.
13.
14.

Diagnosis of breast cancer with core-biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology.

Poole GH, Willsher PC, Pinder SE, Robertson JF, Elston CW, Blamey RW.

Aust N Z J Surg. 1996 Sep;66(9):592-4.

PMID:
8859156
15.

Comparison of accuracy of diagnostic modalities for evaluation of breast cancer with review of literature.

Bukhari MH, Akhtar ZM.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2009 Jun;37(6):416-24. doi: 10.1002/dc.21000. Review.

PMID:
19217034
16.

Imprint cytology of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy specimens: a rapid diagnostic tool in non-palpable solid lesions.

Oikonomou V, Fotou M, Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Nonni A, Athanassiadou P, Drouveli T, Patsouris E, Kotzia E, Zografos GC.

Cytopathology. 2008 Oct;19(5):311-5. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17953690
17.
18.
19.

Randomized comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and Biopty-Cut needle biopsy after unsatisfactory initial cytology of discrete breast lesions.

Carty NJ, Ravichandran D, Carter C, Mudan S, Royle GT, Taylor I.

Br J Surg. 1994 Sep;81(9):1313-4.

PMID:
7953396
20.

Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period.

Howlett DC, Harper B, Quante M, Berresford A, Morley M, Grant J, Ramesar K, Barnes S.

J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Jun;121(6):571-9. Epub 2006 Nov 30.

PMID:
17134537

Supplemental Content

Support Center