Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 173

1.

Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography.

Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Mar;67(3):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.089.

PMID:
19231771
2.

[Anthropometric analysis of the mandible morphology in young females with different vertical skeletal pattern].

Xie Z, Li G, Guo J.

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;30(3):299-303. Chinese.

3.

Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.

Swasty D, Lee J, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):e377-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.039.

PMID:
21435546
4.

[Three-dimensional survey of the whole mandibular canal and mandibular morphology by cone beam computed tomography in normal young people].

Sheng L, Qu W, Li Y, Qu Z, Wang J.

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Apr;34(2):156-61. Chinese.

5.

Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.

Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.057.

PMID:
21457860
6.

Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.

Braut V, Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Buser D.

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Apr;32(2):175-84.

PMID:
22292147
7.

Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Veli I, Uysal T, Baysal A, Karadede I.

J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Nov;75(6):417-29. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0235-7. Epub 2014 Oct 26.

PMID:
25344123
8.

Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.

Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C.

Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):939-51. doi: 10.2319/121009-709.1.

PMID:
20578867
9.

Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation.

Momin MA, Matsumoto K, Ejima K, Asaumi R, Kawai T, Arai Y, Honda K, Yosue T.

Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 May;35(4):311-8. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-1031-y. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

PMID:
23143074
10.

Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination.

Koivisto T, Chiona D, Milroy LL, McClanahan SB, Ahmad M, Bowles WR.

J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1018-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 May 11.

PMID:
27178249
11.

Cortical bone thickness of the adult alveolar process--a retrospective CBCT study.

Germec-Cakan D, Tozlu M, Ozdemir F.

Aust Orthod J. 2014 May;30(1):54-60.

PMID:
24968646
12.

Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.

Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Feb;143(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.013.

PMID:
23374925
13.

Observation of buccal foramen in mandibular body using cone-beam computed tomography.

Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E.

Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2009 May;86(1):25-9.

14.

Bone mineral density and mandibular residual ridge resorption.

Springe B, Slaidina A, Soboleva U, Lejnieks A.

Int J Prosthodont. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):270-6. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3283.

PMID:
24905270
15.

Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients.

Gracco A, Luca L, Bongiorno MC, Siciliani G.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.030.

PMID:
20691359
16.

Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.

Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):721.e7-12.

PMID:
16769488
17.

Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.

Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Zöller JE, Kreppel M.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;43(2):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

PMID:
25547216
18.

The thickness of alveolar bone at the mandibular canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion.

Park JB, Lee JE, Kim K, Yoo JT, Kim Y, Kook YA, Ko Y.

J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):1115-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000767.

PMID:
24769616
19.

Location of the mandibular canal and thickness of the occlusal cortical bone at dental implant sites in the lower second premolar and first molar.

Hsu JT, Huang HL, Fuh LJ, Li RW, Wu J, Tsai MT, Shen YW, Tu MG.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:608570. doi: 10.1155/2013/608570. Epub 2013 Nov 3.

20.

Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography.

Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Borstlap WA, Bronkhorst EM, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):793-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02459.x. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

PMID:
22469137

Supplemental Content

Support Center