Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Statistical inferences in phylogeography.

Nielsen R, Beaumont MA.

Mol Ecol. 2009 Mar;18(6):1034-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04059.x. Epub 2009 Jan 31. Review.

PMID:
19207258
2.

Statistical phylogeography.

Knowles LL, Maddison WP.

Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2623-35.

PMID:
12453245
3.

On the validity of nested clade phylogeographical analysis.

Beaumont MA, Panchal M.

Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(11):2563-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03786.x. Epub 2008 May 8. No abstract available.

PMID:
18482264
4.
5.

An information-theoretical approach to phylogeography.

Carstens BC, Stoute HN, Reid NM.

Mol Ecol. 2009 Oct;18(20):4270-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04327.x. Epub 2009 Sep 18. Erratum in: Mol Ecol. 2010 Feb;19(3):620.

PMID:
19765225
6.

Species tree discordance traces to phylogeographic clade boundaries in North American fence lizards (Sceloporus).

Leaché AD.

Syst Biol. 2009 Dec;58(6):547-59. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp057. Epub 2009 Sep 21.

PMID:
20525608
7.

Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow.

Eckert AJ, Carstens BC.

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Dec;49(3):832-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Sep 21.

PMID:
18845264
8.

The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis.

Panchal M, Beaumont MA.

Evolution. 2007 Jun;61(6):1466-80.

PMID:
17542853
9.

Using RAxML to Infer Phylogenies.

Stamatakis A.

Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 3;51:6.14.1-14. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0614s51.

PMID:
26334924
10.

Why does a method that fails continue to be used?

Knowles LL.

Evolution. 2008 Nov;62(11):2713-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00481.x.

11.

Phylogeography's past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, 2000.

Hickerson MJ, Carstens BC, Cavender-Bares J, Crandall KA, Graham CH, Johnson JB, Rissler L, Victoriano PF, Yoder AD.

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Jan;54(1):291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.016. Epub 2009 Sep 13. Review.

PMID:
19755165
12.

Does organismal pedigree impact the magnitude of topological congruence among gene trees for unlinked loci?

Kuo CH, Avise JC.

Genetica. 2008 Mar;132(3):219-25. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

PMID:
17636429
13.

Landscape genetics in a changing world: disentangling historical and contemporary influences and inferring change.

Epps CW, Keyghobadi N.

Mol Ecol. 2015 Dec;24(24):6021-40. doi: 10.1111/mec.13454. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Review.

PMID:
26547281
15.

Joint inference of population assignment and demographic history.

Choi SC, Hey J.

Genetics. 2011 Oct;189(2):561-77. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.129205. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

16.

Divergence genetics analysis reveals historical population genetic processes leading to contrasting phylogeographic patterns in co-distributed species.

McGovern TM, Keever CC, Saski CA, Hart MW, Marko PB.

Mol Ecol. 2010 Nov;19(22):5043-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04854.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

PMID:
21040048
17.

The automation of Nested Clade Phylogeographic Analysis.

Panchal M.

Bioinformatics. 2007 Feb 15;23(4):509-10. Epub 2006 Dec 1.

PMID:
17142814
18.
19.

apTreeshape: statistical analysis of phylogenetic tree shape.

Bortolussi N, Durand E, Blum M, François O.

Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):363-4. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

PMID:
16322049
20.

Evaluating nested clade phylogeographic analysis under models of restricted gene flow.

Panchal M, Beaumont MA.

Syst Biol. 2010 Jul;59(4):415-32. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq022. Epub 2010 May 24.

PMID:
20547778

Supplemental Content

Support Center