Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 485

1.

Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee--image quality and diagnostic performance.

Ristow O, Steinbach L, Sabo G, Krug R, Huber M, Rauscher I, Ma B, Link TM.

Eur Radiol. 2009 May;19(5):1263-72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1260-y.

PMID:
19137309
2.

Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.

Ristow O, Stehling C, Krug R, Steinbach L, Sabo G, Ambekar A, Huber M, Link TM.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr;34(2):260-9. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181c20f6d.

PMID:
20351518
3.

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.

Welsch GH, Zak L, Mamisch TC, Resinger C, Marlovits S, Trattnig S.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):603-12. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b5333c.

PMID:
19692843
4.
5.

High-resolution proton density weighted three-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) of the knee with IDEAL at 1.5 Tesla: comparison with 3D-FSE and 2D-FSE--initial experience.

McMahon CJ, Madhuranthakam AJ, Wu JS, Yablon CM, Wei JL, Rofsky NM, Hochman MG.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Feb;35(2):361-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22829.

PMID:
22034221
6.

MRI of the knee at 3T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence.

Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Pietschmann MF, Müller PE, Horger W, Park J, Crispin A, del Olmo JR, Weckbach S, Herrmann KA, Reiser MF, Glaser C.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):585-97. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c1a1.

PMID:
19668001
7.
8.
9.

[MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences].

Cova M, Stacul F, Cester G, Ukmar M, Pozzi Mucelli R.

Radiol Med. 2003 Sep;106(3):178-90. English, Italian.

PMID:
14612839
10.
11.
12.

3D-imaging of the knee with an optimized 3D-FSE-sequence and a 15-channel knee-coil.

Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Kuschel B, Paul D, Li G, Raya JG, Reiser MF, Glaser C.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.020.

PMID:
22579529
13.

Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, Ferrone CR, Hahn PF, Sahani DV.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193.

PMID:
19478628
14.

Clinical value of routine use of thin-section 3D MRI using 3D FSE sequences with a variable flip angle technique for internal derangements of the knee joint at 3T.

Kudo H, Inaoka T, Kitamura N, Nakatsuka T, Kasuya S, Kasai R, Tozawa M, Nakagawa K, Terada H.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Oct;31(8):1309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.02.003.

PMID:
23684241
15.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.

Meindl T, Wirth S, Weckbach S, Dietrich O, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):713-21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1175-7.

PMID:
18813933
16.

Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences.

Fischbach F, Bruhn H, Unterhauser F, Ricke J, Wieners G, Felix R, Weiler A, Schröder RJ.

Acta Radiol. 2005 Feb;46(1):67-73. Erratum in: Acta Radiol. 2005 Apr;46(2):218.

PMID:
15841742
17.

Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee.

Wong S, Steinbach L, Zhao J, Stehling C, Ma CB, Link TM.

Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Aug;38(8):761-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0683-0.

18.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence.

Komada T, Naganawa S, Ogawa H, Matsushima M, Kubota S, Kawai H, Fukatsu H, Ikeda M, Kawamura M, Sakurai Y, Maruyama K.

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(1):13-21.

19.

Knee derangements: comparison of isotropic 3D fast spin-echo, isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo, and conventional 2D fast spin-echo MR imaging.

Jung JY, Yoon YC, Kim HR, Choe BK, Wang JH, Jung JY.

Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):802-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121990.

PMID:
23533289
20.

Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: assessment of a three-dimensional fast spin-echo with extended echo train acquisition sequence at 1.5 Tesla.

Denoiseux CC, Boulay-Coletta I, Nakache JP, Claude ID, Zins M.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Aug;38(2):336-43. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23975.

PMID:
23239080

Supplemental Content

Support Center