Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 117

1.

Adaptive-optics imaging of human cone photoreceptor distribution.

Chui TY, Song H, Burns SA.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2008 Dec;25(12):3021-9.

2.

Automated identification of cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics retinal images.

Li KY, Roorda A.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 May;24(5):1358-63.

PMID:
17429481
3.

Variation in rod and cone density from the fovea to the mid-periphery in healthy human retinas using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Wells-Gray EM, Choi SS, Bries A, Doble N.

Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1135-43. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.107. Epub 2016 May 27.

4.

Automated analysis of differential interference contrast microscopy images of the foveal cone mosaic.

Wojtas DH, Wu B, Ahnelt PK, Bones PJ, Millane RP.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2008 May;25(5):1181-9.

PMID:
18451927
5.

Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.

Li KY, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6858-67. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5499. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

6.

Automatic detection of modal spacing (Yellott's ring) in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images.

Cooper RF, Langlo CS, Dubra A, Carroll J.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jul;33(4):540-9. doi: 10.1111/opo.12070. Epub 2013 May 13.

7.

Cone photoreceptor definition on adaptive optics retinal imaging.

Muthiah MN, Gias C, Chen FK, Zhong J, McClelland Z, Sallo FB, Peto T, Coffey PJ, da Cruz L.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1073-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304615. Epub 2014 Apr 11.

8.

Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Chui TY, Song H, Burns SA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4679-87. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2135. Epub 2008 Jun 14. Erratum in: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):46.

9.

Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera.

Xue B, Choi SS, Doble N, Werner JS.

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 May;24(5):1364-72.

10.

The organization of the cone photoreceptor mosaic measured in the living human retina.

Sawides L, de Castro A, Burns SA.

Vision Res. 2017 Mar;132:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

PMID:
27353225
11.

Repeatability of in vivo parafoveal cone density and spacing measurements.

Garrioch R, Langlo C, Dubis AM, Cooper RF, Dubra A, Carroll J.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 May;89(5):632-43. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182540562.

12.

Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age.

Song H, Chui TY, Zhong Z, Elsner AE, Burns SA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 21;52(10):7376-84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7199. Print 2011 Sep.

13.

Distribution differences of macular cones measured by AOSLO: Variation in slope from fovea to periphery more pronounced than differences in total cones.

Elsner AE, Chui TY, Feng L, Song HX, Papay JA, Burns SA.

Vision Res. 2017 Mar;132:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

PMID:
27793592
14.

High-resolution retinal imaging of cone-rod dystrophy.

Wolfing JI, Chung M, Carroll J, Roorda A, Williams DR.

Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):1019.e1. Epub 2006 May 2.

PMID:
16650474
15.

Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.

Zhang T, Godara P, Blanco ER, Griffin RL, Wang X, Curcio CA, Zhang Y.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;160(2):290-300.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.034. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

16.

Comparing Parafoveal Cone Photoreceptor Mosaic Metrics in Younger and Older Age Groups Using an Adaptive Optics Retinal Camera.

Jacob J, Paques M, Krivosic V, Dupas B, Erginay A, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A.

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Jan 1;48(1):45-50. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20161219-06.

PMID:
28060393
17.

High-resolution imaging of resolved central serous chorioretinopathy using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Ooto S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A, Tsujikawa A, Yamashiro K, Ojima Y, Yamada Y, Mukai H, Oshima S, Inoue T, Yoshimura N.

Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1800-9, 1809.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.042. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

PMID:
20673590
18.

Technical factors influencing cone packing density estimates in adaptive optics flood illuminated retinal images.

Lombardo M, Serrao S, Lombardo G.

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 9;9(9):e107402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107402. eCollection 2014.

19.

Cone photoreceptor packing density and the outer nuclear layer thickness in healthy subjects.

Chui TY, Song H, Clark CA, Papay JA, Burns SA, Elsner AE.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 14;53(7):3545-53. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8694.

20.

Retinal imaging with adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in unexplained central ring scotoma.

Joeres S, Jones SM, Chen DC, Silva D, Olivier S, Fawzi A, Castellarin A, Sadda SR.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;126(4):543-7. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.33.

PMID:
18413527

Supplemental Content

Support Center