Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 535

1.

Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review.

Roundtree AK, Kallen MA, Lopez-Olivo MA, Kimmel B, Skidmore B, Ortiz Z, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013763
2.

Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.

Kelly KD, Travers A, Dorgan M, Slater L, Rowe BH.

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26.

PMID:
11679863
4.

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.

PMID:
17205029
5.

How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x. Review.

PMID:
19469725
6.

Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.

Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team.

BMC Med. 2003 Nov 24;1:2.

7.

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.

MacDonald SL, Canfield SE, Fesperman SF, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):648-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.127. Epub 2010 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
20639030
8.

Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.

Royle PL, Bain L, Waugh NR.

Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1386-93.

PMID:
16176201
9.

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews.

Al Faleh K, Al-Omran M.

BMC Pediatr. 2009 Jun 17;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-38.

10.

Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements on the use of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Lopez-Olivo MA, Kallen MA, Ortiz Z, Skidmore B, Suarez-Almazor ME.

Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov 15;59(11):1625-38. doi: 10.1002/art.24207. Review.

11.

No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Tetzlaff J, Cogo E, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):748-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18586178
12.

Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):43-54.

PMID:
12897595
13.
14.

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor.

Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Carlberg B, Tleyjeh IM, Kamath CC, LaBella ML, Erwin PJ, Guyatt GH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013767
15.

[Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].

Hou ZK, Li JS, Yu XQ, Li B, Zhou HY, Zhang YX.

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009 Apr;21(4):207-10. Chinese.

16.

Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.

Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB.

Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00823.x. Review.

17.

Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?

Koletsi D, Karagianni A, Pandis N, Makou M, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.024.

PMID:
19892276
18.

Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.

Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.004.

PMID:
18471656
19.

Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).

Flores-Mir C, Major MP, Major PW.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):214-7.

PMID:
16905066
20.

Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.

Cornelius VR, Perrio MJ, Shakir SA, Smith LA.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Dec;18(12):1223-31. doi: 10.1002/pds.1844.

PMID:
19757414

Supplemental Content

Support Center