Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Negative confounding in the evaluation of toxicity: the case of methylmercury in fish and seafood.

Choi AL, Cordier S, Weihe P, Grandjean P.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38(10):877-93. doi: 10.1080/10408440802273164 . Review. Erratum in: Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(1):95.

2.

Separation of risks and benefits of seafood intake.

Budtz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P, Weihe P.

Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Mar;115(3):323-7. Epub 2006 Dec 14.

3.

[Fish and seafood as a source of human exposure to methylmercury].

Mania M, Wojciechowska-Mazurek M, Starska K, Rebeniak M, Postupolski J.

Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2012;63(3):257-64. Polish.

4.

Ranking the contributions of commercial fish and shellfish varieties to mercury exposure in the United States: implications for risk communication.

Groth E 3rd.

Environ Res. 2010 Apr;110(3):226-36. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

PMID:
20116785
5.

Negative confounding by essential fatty acids in methylmercury neurotoxicity associations.

Choi AL, Mogensen UB, Bjerve KS, Debes F, Weihe P, Grandjean P, Budtz-Jørgensen E.

Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2014 Mar-Apr;42:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

6.

Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits.

Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB.

JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1885-99. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2007 Feb 14;297(6):590.

PMID:
17047219
7.

Scientific foundations of fish-consumption advice for pregnant women: Epidemiological evidence, benefit-risk modeling, and an integrated approach.

Groth E 3rd.

Environ Res. 2017 Jan;152:386-406. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Jul 28. Review.

PMID:
27475784
8.

Defining a lowest observable adverse effect hair concentrations of mercury for neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal methylmercury exposure through maternal fish consumption: a systematic review.

Schoeman K, Bend JR, Hill J, Nash K, Koren G.

Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Dec;31(6):670-82. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181bb0ea1. Review.

PMID:
19865003
9.

Fish consumption patterns and hair mercury levels in children and their mothers in 17 EU countries.

Castaño A, Cutanda F, Esteban M, Pärt P, Navarro C, Gómez S, Rosado M, López A, López E, Exley K, Schindler BK, Govarts E, Casteleyn L, Kolossa-Gehring M, Fiddicke U, Koch H, Angerer J, Den Hond E, Schoeters G, Sepai O, Horvat M, Knudsen LE, Aerts D, Joas A, Biot P, Joas R, Jiménez-Guerrero JA, Diaz G, Pirard C, Katsonouri A, Cerna M, Gutleb AC, Ligocka D, Reis FM, Berglund M, Lupsa IR, Halzlová K, Charlier C, Cullen E, Hadjipanayis A, Krsková A, Jensen JF, Nielsen JK, Schwedler G, Wilhelm M, Rudnai P, Középesy S, Davidson F, Fischer ME, Janasik B, Namorado S, Gurzau AE, Jajcaj M, Mazej D, Tratnik JS, Larsson K, Lehmann A, Crettaz P, Lavranos G, Posada M.

Environ Res. 2015 Aug;141:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.029. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

10.

Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances in fish: human health considerations.

Dórea JG.

Sci Total Environ. 2008 Aug 1;400(1-3):93-114. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.017. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

PMID:
18653214
11.

Mercury in the seafood and human exposure in coastal area of Guangdong province, South China.

Li P, Feng X, Liang P, Man Chan H, Yan H, Chen L.

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Mar;32(3):541-7. doi: 10.1002/etc.2113. Erratum in: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Apr;32(4):967.

PMID:
23280831
12.

Mercury in seafood: mechanisms of accumulation and consequences for consumer health.

Balshaw S, Edwards J, Daughtry B, Ross K.

Rev Environ Health. 2007 Apr-Jun;22(2):91-113. Review.

PMID:
17894202
13.

Exposure assessment for methyl and total mercury from seafood consumption in Korea, 2005 to 2008.

Moon HB, Kim SJ, Park H, Jung YS, Lee S, Kim YH, Choi M.

J Environ Monit. 2011 Sep;13(9):2400-5. doi: 10.1039/c1em10504c. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

PMID:
21847486
14.
15.

Shellfish and residual chemical contaminants: hazards, monitoring, and health risk assessment along French coasts.

Guéguen M, Amiard JC, Arnich N, Badot PM, Claisse D, Guérin T, Vernoux JP.

Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011;213:55-111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9860-6_3. Review.

PMID:
21541848
16.

Risks and benefits of consumption of Great Lakes fish.

Turyk ME, Bhavsar SP, Bowerman W, Boysen E, Clark M, Diamond M, Mergler D, Pantazopoulos P, Schantz S, Carpenter DO.

Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jan;120(1):11-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003396. Epub 2011 Sep 23. Review.

17.

Risk assessment of dietary exposure to methylmercury in fish in the UK.

Maycock BJ, Benford DJ.

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007 Mar;26(3):185-90.

PMID:
17439921
18.

Mercury-nutrient signatures in seafood and in the blood of avid seafood consumers.

Karimi R, Fisher NS, Meliker JR.

Sci Total Environ. 2014 Oct 15;496:636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.049. Epub 2014 May 17.

PMID:
24846746
19.

An exposure assessment for methylmercury from seafood for consumers in the United States.

Carrington CD, Bolger MP.

Risk Anal. 2002 Aug;22(4):689-99.

PMID:
12224743
20.

Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: implications for policy.

Selin NE, Sunderland EM, Knightes CD, Mason RP.

Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jan;118(1):137-43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900811.

Supplemental Content

Support Center