Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?

Leijte JA, Horenblas S.

World J Urol. 2009 Apr;27(2):151-4. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0308-6. Epub 2008 Aug 9. Review.

PMID:
18690458
2.

Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma.

Leijte JA, Gallee M, Antonini N, Horenblas S.

J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):933-8; discussion 938. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18635216
3.

Re: Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma: J. A. Leijte, M. Gallee, N. Antonini and S. Horenblas J Urol 2008; 180: 933-938.

Zhu Y, Ye DW.

J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1501-2; author reply 1502. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.046. Epub 2009 Jan 20. No abstract available.

PMID:
19157452
4.

External validation of the proposed T and N categories of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Al-Najar A, Alkatout I, Al-Sanabani S, Korda JB, Hegele A, Bolenz C, Jünemann KP, Naumann CM.

Int J Urol. 2011 Apr;18(4):312-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02722.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

5.

Clear-cell differentiation and lymphatic invasion, but not the revised TNM classification, predict lymph node metastases in pT1 penile cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 76 patients from a low incidence area.

Mannweiler S, Sygulla S, Tsybrovskyy O, Razmara Y, Pummer K, Regauer S.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

PMID:
22421354
6.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients.

Scarpa A, Mantovani W, Capelli P, Beghelli S, Boninsegna L, Bettini R, Panzuto F, Pederzoli P, delle Fave G, Falconi M.

Mod Pathol. 2010 Jun;23(6):824-33. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.58. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

7.

Modification of N staging systems for penile cancer: a more precise prediction of prognosis.

Li ZS, Yao K, Chen P, Wang B, Chen JP, Mi QW, Li YH, Liu ZW, Qin ZK, Zhou FJ, Han H.

Br J Cancer. 2015 May 26;112(11):1766-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.141. Epub 2015 May 5. Erratum in: Br J Cancer. 2015 Dec 22;113(12):1746.

8.

TNM: evolution and relation to other prognostic factors.

Sobin LH.

Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21(1):3-7.

PMID:
12923909
9.

Penile cancer: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and staging.

Barocas DA, Chang SS.

Urol Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;37(3):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2010.04.002.

PMID:
20674691
10.

Pathological factors, behavior, and histological prognostic risk groups in subtypes of penile squamous cell carcinomas (SCC).

Sanchez DF, Soares F, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Cañete S, Fernández-Nestosa MJ, Rodríguez IM, Barreto J, Cubilla AL.

Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015 May;32(3):222-31. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2014.12.017. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

PMID:
25677263
11.

Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system.

Gettman MT, Blute ML, Spotts B, Bryant SC, Zincke H.

Cancer. 2001 Jan 15;91(2):354-61.

PMID:
11180082
12.

Diagnosis and staging of penile cancer.

Heyns CF, Mendoza-Valdés A, Pompeo AC.

Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.002. Review.

PMID:
20691881
13.

Advanced penile carcinoma.

Culkin DJ, Beer TM.

J Urol. 2003 Aug;170(2 Pt 1):359-65. Review.

PMID:
12853775
14.
15.

Staging of peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: appraisal of the new TNM classification and its modifications.

Igami T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Takahashi Y, Nagino M.

World J Surg. 2011 Nov;35(11):2501-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1242-0.

PMID:
21879422
16.

Pathologic Evaluation and Reporting of Carcinoma of the Penis.

Erbersdobler A.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Apr;15(2):192-195. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 10. Review.

PMID:
27594553
17.

[Carcinoma of the penis. Staging].

Giambroni L, Tralce L, Cancarini G, Cosciani Cunico S.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1996 Jun;68(3):141-3. Italian.

PMID:
8767500
18.

Association between lymph node density and disease specific survival in patients with penile cancer.

Svatek RS, Munsell M, Kincaid JM, Hegarty P, Slaton JW, Busby JE, Gaston KE, Spiess PE, Pagliaro LC, Tamboli P, Pettaway CA.

J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.029. Epub 2009 Oct 17.

PMID:
19837433
19.

Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy.

Lopes A, Hidalgo GS, Kowalski LP, Torloni H, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP.

J Urol. 1996 Nov;156(5):1637-42.

PMID:
8863559
20.

Prognostic risk stratification derived from individual patient level data for men with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy.

Pond GR, Di Lorenzo G, Necchi A, Eigl BJ, Kolinsky MP, Chacko RT, Dorff TB, Harshman LC, Milowsky MI, Lee RJ, Galsky MD, Federico P, Bolger G, DeShazo M, Mehta A, Goyal J, Sonpavde G.

Urol Oncol. 2014 May;32(4):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

PMID:
24332646

Supplemental Content

Support Center