Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 3695

1.

A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.

Berman DW, Crump KS.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38 Suppl 1:49-73. doi: 10.1080/10408440802273156.

PMID:
18686078
2.

Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.

Berman DW, Crump KS.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38 Suppl 1:1-47. doi: 10.1080/10408440802276167.

PMID:
18671157
3.

Comparing milled fiber, Quebec ore, and textile factory dust: has another piece of the asbestos puzzle fallen into place?

Berman DW.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010;40(2):151-88. doi: 10.3109/10408440903349137. Review.

PMID:
20085481
5.

An evaluation of the risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma from exposure to amphibole cleavage fragments.

Gamble JF, Gibbs GW.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1 Suppl):S154-86. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.09.020. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
18396365
6.

An epidemiological study of the role of chrysotile asbestos fibre dimensions in determining respiratory disease risk in exposed workers.

Stayner L, Kuempel E, Gilbert S, Hein M, Dement J.

Occup Environ Med. 2008 Sep;65(9):613-9. Epub 2007 Dec 20.

PMID:
18096653
7.

The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure.

Hodgson JT, Darnton A.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Dec;44(8):565-601.

PMID:
11108782
8.

An evaluation of reported no-effect chrysotile asbestos exposures for lung cancer and mesothelioma.

Pierce JS, McKinley MA, Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38(3):191-214. doi: 10.1080/10408440701845609. Review.

PMID:
18324516
9.

The health effects of chrysotile: current perspective based upon recent data.

Bernstein DM, Hoskins JA.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Aug;45(3):252-64. Epub 2006 Jul 11. Review.

PMID:
16814911
10.

The biopersistence of brazilian chrysotile asbestos following inhalation.

Bernstein DM, Rogers R, Smith P.

Inhal Toxicol. 2004 Oct-Nov;16(11-12):745-61.

PMID:
16036745
11.
12.

The sizes, shapes, and mineralogy of asbestos structures that induce lung tumors or mesothelioma in AF/HAN rats following inhalation.

Berman DW, Crump KS, Chatfield EJ, Davis JM, Jones AD.

Risk Anal. 1995 Apr;15(2):181-95. Erratum in: Risk Anal 1995 Aug;15(4):541.

PMID:
7597255
13.

Occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and cancer risk: a review of the amphibole hypothesis.

Stayner LT, Dankovic DA, Lemen RA.

Am J Public Health. 1996 Feb;86(2):179-86. Review.

14.

An overview of the risk of lung cancer in relation to exposure to asbestos and of taconite miners.

Berry G, Gibbs GW.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1 Suppl):S218-22. Epub 2007 Oct 5. Review.

PMID:
17998152
15.

Chrysotile as a cause of mesothelioma: an assessment based on epidemiology.

Yarborough CM.

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006 Feb;36(2):165-87. Review.

PMID:
16736942
16.
17.

Exposure and mineralogical correlates of pulmonary fibrosis in chrysotile asbestos workers.

Green FH, Harley R, Vallyathan V, Althouse R, Fick G, Dement J, Mitha R, Pooley F.

Occup Environ Med. 1997 Aug;54(8):549-59.

18.

Fibers in lung tissues of mesothelioma cases among miners and millers of the township of Asbestos, Quebec.

Dufresne A, Harrigan M, Massé S, Bégin R.

Am J Ind Med. 1995 Apr;27(4):581-92.

PMID:
7793429
19.

A study of airborne chrysotile concentrations associated with handling, unpacking, and repacking boxes of automobile clutch discs.

Jiang GC, Madl AK, Ingmundson KJ, Murbach DM, Fehling KA, Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;51(1):87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

PMID:
18440685
20.

Chrysotile asbestos is the main cause of pleural mesothelioma.

Smith AH, Wright CC.

Am J Ind Med. 1996 Sep;30(3):252-66. Review.

PMID:
8876792

Supplemental Content

Support Center