Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range.

Lam FH, Steger DJ, O'Shea EK.

Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):246-50. doi: 10.1038/nature06867. Epub 2008 Apr 16.

2.

Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity.

Hartley PD, Madhani HD.

Cell. 2009 May 1;137(3):445-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.043.

3.

Common chromatin architecture, common chromatin remodeling, and common transcription kinetics of Adr1-dependent genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Agricola E, Verdone L, Xella B, Di Mauro E, Caserta M.

Biochemistry. 2004 Jul 13;43(27):8878-84.

PMID:
15236596
4.

Activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS3 results in Gcn4p-dependent, SWI/SNF-dependent mobilization of nucleosomes over the entire gene.

Kim Y, McLaughlin N, Lindstrom K, Tsukiyama T, Clark DJ.

Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Nov;26(22):8607-22. Epub 2006 Sep 18.

5.

Different roles for abf1p and a T-rich promoter element in nucleosome organization of the yeast RPS28A gene.

Lascaris RF, Groot E, Hoen PB, Mager WH, Planta RJ.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Mar 15;28(6):1390-6.

6.

Nucleosomes Are Essential for Proper Regulation of a Multigated Promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Yarrington RM, Goodrum JM, Stillman DJ.

Genetics. 2016 Feb;202(2):551-63. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.183715. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

7.

Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters.

Tolkunov D, Zawadzki KA, Singer C, Elfving N, Morozov AV, Broach JR.

Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Jun 15;22(12):2106-18. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0826. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

8.
9.

Z curve theory-based analysis of the dynamic nature of nucleosome positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Wu X, Liu H, Liu H, Su J, Lv J, Cui Y, Wang F, Zhang Y.

Gene. 2013 Nov 1;530(1):8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

PMID:
23958656
11.

Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription.

Whitehouse I, Rando OJ, Delrow J, Tsukiyama T.

Nature. 2007 Dec 13;450(7172):1031-5.

PMID:
18075583
12.
13.
14.

Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.

Ozonov EA, van Nimwegen E.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(8):e1003181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003181. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

15.

Role of the repressor Oaf3p in the recruitment of transcription factors and chromatin dynamics during the oleate response.

Wan Y, Arens CE, Wang S, Zuo X, Zhuo Y, Xing J, Liu H.

Biochem J. 2013 Jan 15;449(2):507-17. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121029.

PMID:
23088601
16.

Opening windows to the genome.

Whitehouse I, Tsukiyama T.

Cell. 2009 May 1;137(3):400-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.026.

17.

Activation of the weakly regulated PHO8 promoter in S. cerevisiae: chromatin transition and binding sites for the positive regulatory protein PHO4.

Barbarić S, Fascher KD, Hörz W.

Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 11;20(5):1031-8. Erratum in: Nucleic Acids Res 1992 Mar 25;20(6):1450.

18.
19.

Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but are linked to transcription and chromatin regulators.

Huebert DJ, Kuan PF, Keleş S, Gasch AP.

Mol Cell Biol. 2012 May;32(9):1645-53. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06170-11. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Supplemental Content

Support Center