Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 359

1.

Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Mok JM, Berven SH, Diab M, Hackbarth M, Hu SS, Deviren V.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 15;33(6):681-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa8d.

PMID:
18344863
2.

Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.

Kuklo TR, Potter BK, O'Brien MF, Schroeder TM, Lenke LG, Polly DW Jr; Spinal Deformity Study Group.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Apr;18(2):152-9.

PMID:
15800433
3.

Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.

Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, Ouellet JA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7.

PMID:
12782983
4.

Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?

De Carvalho A, Vialle R, Thomsen L, Amzallag J, Cluzel G, le Pointe HD, Mary P.

Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1615-20. Epub 2007 Jul 10.

5.

Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O'Brien MF.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11):1240-6.

PMID:
16688038
6.

Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.

Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM.

Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct;16(10):1587-92. Epub 2007 Jun 5.

7.

Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.

Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Polly DW Jr, O'Brien MF, Schroeder TM, Lenke LG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 15;30(4):444-54.

PMID:
15706343
8.

Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.

Zmurko MG, Mooney JF 3rd, Podeszwa DA, Minster GJ, Mendelow MJ, Guirgues A.

J Surg Orthop Adv. 2003 Winter;12(4):208-13.

PMID:
15008284
9.

Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.

Somoskeöy S, Tunyogi-Csapó M, Bogyó C, Illés T.

Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):960-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.175. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

PMID:
23018164
10.

Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis.

Aubin CE, Bellefleur C, Joncas J, de Lanauze D, Kadoury S, Blanke K, Parent S, Labelle H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 20;36(12):E780-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f0825a.

PMID:
21224755
11.

Reliability of digital radiographs for pediatric lower extremity alignment.

Nowicki PD, Vanderhave KL, Farley FA, Kuhns LR, Dahl W, Caird MS.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Sep;32(6):631-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182694e07.

PMID:
22892628
12.

Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.

Hardesty CK, Aronson J, Aronson EA, Ranade AS, McCracken CW, Nick TG, Cordell CL.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Mar;33(2):163-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182770bd3.

PMID:
23389571
13.

Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.

Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):e86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00311.

PMID:
22717838
14.

A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.

Zhang J, Lou E, Shi X, Wang Y, Hill DL, Raso JV, Le LH, Lv L.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):383-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bb9a3c.

PMID:
20124919
15.

Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.

Qiao J, Liu Z, Xu L, Wu T, Zheng X, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Qian B, Qiu Y.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jun;25(4):E88-92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182463964.

PMID:
22237178
16.

Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Potter BK, Rosner MK, Lehman RA Jr, Polly DW Jr, Schroeder TM, Kuklo TR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1658-63.

PMID:
16025037
17.

Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.

Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS.

Spine J. 2010 Sep;10(9):769-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.020. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

PMID:
20359959
18.

Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.

Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Harvey JR, Askin GN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1664-9.

PMID:
16025038
19.

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.

Mehta SS, Modi HN, Srinivasalu S, Chen T, Suh SW, Yang JH, Song HR.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Oct-Nov;29(7):749-54. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b72550.

PMID:
20104157
20.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Harms J, Lowe TG, Shufflebarger HL.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Aug;80(8):1097-106.

PMID:
9730118

Supplemental Content

Support Center