Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 70

1.

Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Jensen JA, Svendsen NB.

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1992;39(2):262-7.

PMID:
18263145
2.

A 2D fast near-field method for calculating near-field pressures generated by apodized rectangular pistons.

Chen D, McGough RJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1526-37. doi: 10.1121/1.2950081.

3.

Ultrasound characteristics of focused axisymmetrically curved surface transducers.

Wang HZ, He Y, Yang YH.

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1989;36(1):63-72.

PMID:
18284951
4.

Fast simulation of non-linear pulsed ultrasound fields using an angular spectrum approach.

Du Y, Jensen JA.

Ultrasonics. 2013 Feb;53(2):588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

PMID:
23141667
5.

A concentric-ring equivalent phased array method to model fields of large axisymmetric ultrasound transducers.

Fan X, Moros EG, Straube WL.

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1999;46(4):830-41. doi: 10.1109/58.775647.

PMID:
18238485
6.

Wave envelopes method for description of nonlinear acoustic wave propagation.

Wójcik J, Nowicki A, Lewin PA, Bloomfield PE, Kujawska T, Filipczyński L.

Ultrasonics. 2006 Jul;44(3):310-29. Epub 2006 May 22.

PMID:
16780911
7.

[Analysis of impulse response of rectangular ultrasound transducer].

Bu F, Cao P, Cheng J.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2000 Dec;17(4):425-8. Chinese.

PMID:
11211831
8.

̀Spatial impulse response of a rectangular double curved transducer.

Bæk DB, Jensen JA, Willatzen M.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):2730-41. doi: 10.1121/1.3693659.

PMID:
22501052
9.

Calculation of electron beam dose distributions for arbitrarily shaped fields.

Bruinvis IA, Van Amstel A, Elevelt AJ, Van der Laarse R.

Phys Med Biol. 1983 Jun;28(6):667-83.

PMID:
6410420
10.

Positioning of small particles by an ultrasound field excited by surface waves.

Haake A, Dual J.

Ultrasonics. 2004 Apr;42(1-9):75-80.

PMID:
15047264
11.
12.

An iterative method for the computation of nonlinear, wide-angle, pulsed acoustic fields of medical diagnostic transducers.

Huijssen J, Verweij MD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jan;127(1):33-44. doi: 10.1121/1.3268599.

PMID:
20058948
13.

Theory and experiment of Fourier-Bessel field calculation and tuning of a pulsed wave annular array.

Fox PD, Cheng J, Luc JY.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 May;113(5):2412-23.

PMID:
12765360
14.

Characteristics of the pulsed ultrasound field.

Wien KD, Harder D.

Br J Cancer Suppl. 1982 Mar;5:59-63.

15.

Acoustic field prediction for a single planar continuous-wave source using an equivalent phased array method.

Fan X, Moros EG, Straube WL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2734-41.

PMID:
9373969
16.

Uniform pulsed fields for ultrasonic bioeffect experimentation.

Harrison GH, Balcer-Kubiczek EK.

Ultrasonics. 1991 May;29(3):264-7.

PMID:
2035196
17.

Estimating acoustic peak pressure generated by ultrasound transducers from harmonic distortion level measurement.

Matte GM, Borsboom JM, van Neer P, de Jong N.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Sep;34(9):1528-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 1.

PMID:
18450363
18.

Ultrasound fields in attenuating media.

Lerch R, Friedrich W.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Oct;80(4):1140-7.

PMID:
3771930
19.

A generalized approach for efficient finite element modeling of elastodynamic scattering in two and three dimensions.

Velichko A, Wilcox PD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Sep;128(3):1004-14. doi: 10.1121/1.3467775.

PMID:
20815437
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center