Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 227

1.

Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions.

Leeflang MM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Zwinderman AH.

Clin Chem. 2008 Apr;54(4):729-37. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096032. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

2.

Post hoc choice of cut points introduced bias to diagnostic research.

Ewald B.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):798-801. Epub 2006 May 26. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;60(7):756.

PMID:
16828672
3.

Quantifying the bias associated with use of discrepant analysis.

Lipman HB, Astles JR.

Clin Chem. 1998 Jan;44(1):108-15.

4.

Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point.

Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B.

Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):458-72.

PMID:
16161804
6.

Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.

Gaffikin L, McGrath J, Arbyn M, Blumenthal PD.

Clin Trials. 2008;5(5):496-503. doi: 10.1177/1740774508096139.

PMID:
18827042
10.
11.

Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.

Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2. Review.

PMID:
7853038
12.
13.

The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.

Springate SD.

Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):158-63. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr010. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

PMID:
21447784
14.

Guidelines for the assessment of new diagnostic tests.

van der Schouw YT, Verbeek AL, Ruijs SH.

Invest Radiol. 1995 Jun;30(6):334-40.

PMID:
7490184
15.

The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.

Einstein AJ, Bodian CA, Gil J.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Feb;121(2):110-7.

PMID:
9126035
16.

Special article: an optimistic prognosis for the clinical utility of laboratory test data.

Zheng M, Ravindran P, Wang J, Epstein RH, Chen DP, Butte AJ, Peltz G.

Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):1026-35. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181efff0c. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

PMID:
20810674
17.

How to measure the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive liver fibrosis indices: the area under the ROC curve revisited.

Lambert J, Halfon P, Penaranda G, Bedossa P, Cacoub P, Carrat F.

Clin Chem. 2008 Aug;54(8):1372-8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.097923. Epub 2008 Jun 6.

18.
19.

A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.

Hewett P, Ganser GH.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Oct;51(7):611-32.

PMID:
17940277
20.

Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.

Mulherin SA, Miller WC.

Ann Intern Med. 2002 Oct 1;137(7):598-602.

PMID:
12353947

Supplemental Content

Support Center