Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 299

1.

Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies.

Fine JL, Grzybicki DM, Silowash R, Ho J, Gilbertson JR, Anthony L, Wilson R, Parwani AV, Bastacky SI, Epstein JI, Jukic DM.

Hum Pathol. 2008 Apr;39(4):564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.08.007.

PMID:
18234276
2.

Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.

Camparo P, Egevad L, Algaba F, Berney DM, Boccon-Gibod L, Compérat E, Evans AJ, Grobholz R, Kristiansen G, Langner C, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Oliveira P, Vainer B, Varma M.

APMIS. 2012 Apr;120(4):298-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02872.x. Review.

PMID:
22429212
3.

iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.

Brunelli M, Beccari S, Colombari R, Gobbo S, Giobelli L, Pellegrini A, Chilosi M, Lunardi M, Martignoni G, Scarpa A, Eccher A.

Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1:S12. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S12.

4.

Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study.

Gilbertson JR, Ho J, Anthony L, Jukic DM, Yagi Y, Parwani AV.

BMC Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr 27;6:4.

5.

Accuracy of a remote quantitative image analysis in the whole slide images.

Słodkowska J, Markiewicz T, Grala B, Kozłowski W, Papierz W, Pleskacz K, Murawski P.

Diagn Pathol. 2011 Mar 30;6 Suppl 1:S20. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S20.

6.

Evaluation of the use of digital images for a national prostate core external quality assurance scheme.

Harnden P, Coleman D, Moss S, Kodikara S, Griffin NR, Melia J.

Histopathology. 2011 Oct;59(4):703-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03987.x.

PMID:
22014051
7.

Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies.

Ho J, Parwani AV, Jukic DM, Yagi Y, Anthony L, Gilbertson JR.

Hum Pathol. 2006 Mar;37(3):322-31.

PMID:
16613327
8.

Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology.

Bauer TW, Schoenfield L, Slaw RJ, Yerian L, Sun Z, Henricks WH.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Apr;137(4):518-24. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0678-OA.

PMID:
23323732
9.

Diagnostic concordance in biopsies of deceptive prostatic carcinoma.

Arista-Nasr J, Cortés E, Keirns C, Hatchett A, Loría A.

Rev Invest Clin. 1996 Jul-Aug;48(4):289-96.

PMID:
8916448
10.

Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.

Campbell WS, Hinrichs SH, Lele SM, Baker JJ, Lazenby AJ, Talmon GA, Smith LM, West WW.

Hum Pathol. 2014 Aug;45(8):1713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.04.007.

PMID:
24913758
11.

Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.

Graham AR, Bhattacharyya AK, Scott KM, Lian F, Grasso LL, Richter LC, Carpenter JB, Chiang S, Henderson JT, Lopez AM, Barker GP, Weinstein RS.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Aug;40(8):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.008.

PMID:
19540562
12.

Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Thrall MJ, Wimmer JL, Schwartz MR.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 May;139(5):656-64. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0073-OA.

PMID:
25927149
13.

An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.

Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, Barker G, Scott KM, Richter L, Krupinski EA, Bhattacharyya AK, Davis JR, Graham AR, Rennels M, Russum WC, Goodall JF, Zhou P, Olszak AG, Williams BH, Wyant JC, Bartels PH.

Hum Pathol. 2004 Nov;35(11):1303-14.

PMID:
15668886
14.

Electronic expert consultation using digital still images for evaluation of atypical small acinar proliferations of the prostate: a comparison with immunohistochemistry.

Banihashemi A, Asgari M, Shooshtarizade T, Abolhasani M, Mireskandari M.

Ann Diagn Pathol. 2014 Jun;18(3):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2014.03.001.

PMID:
24767894
16.

Variability in diagnostic opinion among pathologists for single small atypical foci in prostate biopsies.

Van der Kwast TH, Evans A, Lockwood G, Tkachuk D, Bostwick DG, Epstein JI, Humphrey PA, Montironi R, Van Leenders GJ, Pihl CG, Neetens I, Kujala PM, Laurila M, Mazerolles C, Bubendorf L, Finelli A, Watson K, Srigley J.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Feb;34(2):169-77. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181c7997b. Erratum in: Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 May;34(5):688. Pihl, C G[removed].

PMID:
20061936
17.

Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies.

Rodriguez-Urrego PA, Cronin AM, Al-Ahmadie HA, Gopalan A, Tickoo SK, Reuter VE, Fine SW.

Hum Pathol. 2011 Jan;42(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.07.001.

PMID:
20970164
18.

Development and evaluation of the virtual pathology slide: a new tool in telepathology.

Costello SS, Johnston DJ, Dervan PA, O'Shea DG.

J Med Internet Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(2):e11.

19.

Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Pantanowitz L, Sinard JH, Henricks WH, Fatheree LA, Carter AB, Contis L, Beckwith BA, Evans AJ, Lal A, Parwani AV; College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center..

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Dec;137(12):1710-22. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0093-CP. Review.

PMID:
23634907
20.

Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interpretation of immunohistochemical stains of prostate cancer.

Jaraj SJ, Camparo P, Boyle H, Germain F, Nilsson B, Petersson F, Egevad L.

Virchows Arch. 2009 Oct;455(4):375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0833-8.

PMID:
19760433
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center