Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 719

1.

National institutes of health funding for surgical research.

Mann M, Tendulkar A, Birger N, Howard C, Ratcliffe MB.

Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):217-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181568e26.

PMID:
18216525
2.

Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research.

Rangel SJ, Efron B, Moss RL.

Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):277-86; discussion 286-7.

3.
4.
5.

National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research.

Ratcliffe MB, Howard C, Mann M, del Nido P.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;136(2):392-7; discussion 398-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

6.

Comparing National Institutes of Health funding of emergency medicine to four medical specialties.

Bessman SC, Agada NO, Ding R, Chiang W, Bernstein SL, McCarthy ML.

Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01138.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

7.
8.

Little science, big science: strategies for research portfolio selection in academic surgery departments.

Shah A, Pietrobon R, Cook C, Sheth NP, Nguyen L, Guo L, Jacobs DO, Kuo PC.

Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1110-5.

PMID:
18043118
9.

Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery.

Jackson HH, Jackson JD, Mulvihill SJ, Firpo MA, Glasgow RE.

J Surg Res. 2004 Feb;116(2):197-201.

PMID:
15013356
10.

The pediatric surgeon's road to research independence: utility of mentor-based National Institutes of Health grants.

King A, Sharma-Crawford I, Shaaban AF, Inge TH, Crombleholme TM, Warner BW, Lovvorn HN 3rd, Keswani SG.

J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.050. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

PMID:
23582227
11.

Distribution of research awards from the National Institutes of Health among medical schools.

Moy E, Griner PF, Challoner DR, Perry DR.

N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 27;342(4):250-5.

12.

Funding impact of the National Cancer Act and beyond.

Kalberer JT Jr, Newell GR Jr.

Cancer Res. 1979 Oct;39(10):4274-84.

14.

Impact of the National Cancer Act on grant support.

Kalberer JT Jr.

Cancer Res. 1975 Mar;35(3):472-81.

15.

Training future surgical scientists: realities and recommendations.

Suliburk JW, Kao LS, Kozar RA, Mercer DW.

Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):741-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318163d27d. Review.

PMID:
18438110
16.
17.

How important is the contribution of surgical specialties to a medical school's NIH funding?

Ozomaro U, Gutierrez JC, Byrne MM, Zimmers TA, Koniaris LG.

J Surg Res. 2007 Jul;141(1):16-21.

PMID:
17574035
18.

Trends in funding for research on pain: a report on the National Institutes Of Health grant awards over the years 2003 to 2007.

Bradshaw DH, Empy C, Davis P, Lipschitz D, Dalton P, Nakamura Y, Chapman CR.

J Pain. 2008 Dec;9(12):1077-87, 1087.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.008. Erratum in: J Pain. 2010 Sep;11(9):916. Dalton, Peter [added].

PMID:
19038770
19.

Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications.

Kotchen TA, Lindquist T, Miller Sostek A, Hoffmann R, Malik K, Stanfield B.

J Investig Med. 2006 Jan;54(1):13-9.

PMID:
16409886
20.

Commentary: new guidelines for NIH peer review: improving the system or undermining it?

Spiegel AM.

Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):746-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d7e130.

PMID:
20520019

Supplemental Content

Support Center