Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 120

1.

Contact lens correction of presbyopia.

Bennett ES.

Clin Exp Optom. 2008 May;91(3):265-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00242.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8. Review.

2.

Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.

Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5.

PMID:
16909087
3.
4.

Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.

Collins MJ, Brown B, Verney SJ, Makras M, Bowman KJ.

Optom Vis Sci. 1989 Jun;66(6):370-4.

PMID:
2771322
5.

Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.

Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K.

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 May;83(5):266-73.

PMID:
16699438
6.

Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.

Situ P, Du Toit R, Fonn D, Simpson T.

Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jul;29(3):181-4.

PMID:
12861114
7.

Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.

Ueda K, Inagaki Y.

Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Mar;33(2):98-102.

PMID:
17496703
8.

Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.

McGill E, Erickson P.

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988 Aug;65(8):619-26.

PMID:
3177586
9.
10.

Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.

Fulga V, Schroder S, Avraham G, Belkin M.

CLAO J. 1996 Oct;22(4):245-9.

PMID:
8906381
11.

Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.

Madrid-Costa D, García-Lázaro S, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jan;33(1):51-6. doi: 10.1111/opo.12008.

PMID:
23252854
13.

Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections.

Back A, Grant T, Hine N.

Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Jun;69(6):474-80.

PMID:
1641231
14.

Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.

Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Aug;35(8):1401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.026.

PMID:
19631128
15.

Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.

García-Lázaro S, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Radhakrishnan H, Montés-Micó R.

Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00791.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

16.

Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.

Guillon M, Maissa C, Cooper P, Girard-Claudon K, Poling TR.

CLAO J. 2002 Apr;28(2):88-93.

PMID:
12054378
17.

Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.

Fernandes PR, Neves HI, Lopes-Ferreira DP, Jorge JM, González-Meijome JM.

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Mar;90(3):228-35. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318282951b.

PMID:
23376896
18.

[Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].

Avetisov SE, Rybakova EG, Egorova GB, Churkina MN, Borodina NV, Boev VI.

Vestn Oftalmol. 2003 Jul-Aug;119(4):28-31. Russian.

PMID:
12934502
19.

Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.

García-Lázaro S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Radhakrishnan H, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1022-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da324.

PMID:
22729169
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk