Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Litigation-generated science: why should we care?

Boden LI, Ozonoff D.

Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):117-22. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9987.

2.

Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.

Jasanoff S.

Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):123-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9976.

3.

Scientific and legal perspectives on science generated for regulatory activities.

Henry CJ, Conrad JW Jr.

Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):136-41. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9978.

4.

Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.

Merwin SE, Moeller DW, Kennedy WE Jr, Moeller MP.

Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):670-7.

PMID:
11725885
5.
6.

Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.

Cecil JS.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S74-80. Review.

PMID:
16030342
7.

The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.

Krimsky S.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S129-36. Review.

PMID:
16030328
8.

What has a decade of Daubert wrought?

Berger MA.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S59-65.

PMID:
16030340
9.

The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.

Wagner W.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S99-106.

PMID:
16030346
10.

Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.

Thatcher RW, Biver CJ, North DM.

Clin Electroencephalogr. 2003 Apr;34(2):39-53.

PMID:
12784902
11.
12.

Epistemology in the courtroom: a little "knowledge" is a dangerous thing.

Ozonoff D.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S13-5.

PMID:
16030329
13.

The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.

Neufeld PJ.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S107-13.

PMID:
16030325
14.

Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.

Gatowski SI, Dobbin SA, Richardson JT, Ginsburg GP, Merlino ML, Dahir V.

Law Hum Behav. 2001 Oct;25(5):433-58.

PMID:
11688367
15.

Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.

Haack S.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S66-73.

PMID:
16030341
16.

Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.

Cranor C.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S121-8.

PMID:
16030327
17.

Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.

Masten J, Strzelczyk JJ.

Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):678-82.

PMID:
11725886
18.

A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.

Lakoff GP.

Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S114-20.

PMID:
16030326
19.

Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?

Brakel SJ, Gonzalez ER, Cavanaugh JL Jr.

Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1996 Jul;1(3):215-221.

PMID:
10320423
20.

Rethinking the threats to scientific balance in contexts of litigation and regulation.

Freudenburg WR.

Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jan;116(1):142-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9988.

Supplemental Content

Support Center