Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Assessment of the increase in variability when combining volumetric data from different scanners.

Reig S, Sánchez-González J, Arango C, Castro J, González-Pinto A, Ortuño F, Crespo-Facorro B, Bargalló N, Desco M.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):355-68.

PMID:
18064586
2.

Improving tissue classification in MRI: a three-dimensional multispectral discriminant analysis method with automated training class selection.

Harris G, Andreasen NC, Cizadlo T, Bailey JM, Bockholt HJ, Magnotta VA, Arndt S.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Jan-Feb;23(1):144-54.

PMID:
10050826
3.

Intra- and interscanner variability of automated voxel-based volumetry based on a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cerebral structures.

Huppertz HJ, Kröll-Seger J, Klöppel S, Ganz RE, Kassubek J.

Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.066. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

PMID:
19878722
4.

Mapping reliability in multicenter MRI: voxel-based morphometry and cortical thickness.

Schnack HG, van Haren NE, Brouwer RM, van Baal GC, Picchioni M, Weisbrod M, Sauer H, Cannon TD, Huttunen M, Lepage C, Collins DL, Evans A, Murray RM, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Dec;31(12):1967-82. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20991. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

PMID:
21086550
5.

Reliability of medial temporal lobe volume measurements using reformatted 3D images.

Bartzokis G, Altshuler LL, Greider T, Curran J, Keen B, Dixon WJ.

Psychiatry Res. 1998 Apr 10;82(1):11-24.

PMID:
9645547
6.

Multi-spectral brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-Nearest-Neighbor classification.

Vrooman HA, Cocosco CA, van der Lijn F, Stokking R, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW, Breteler MM, Niessen WJ.

Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):71-81. Epub 2007 May 21.

PMID:
17572111
7.

Reliable manual segmentation of the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes on magnetic resonance images of healthy subjects.

Bokde AL, Teipel SJ, Schwarz R, Leinsinger G, Buerger K, Moeller T, Möller HJ, Hampel H.

Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. 2005 Apr;14(3):135-45.

PMID:
15795167
8.

Probabilistic brain tissue segmentation in neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.

Anbeek P, Vincken KL, Groenendaal F, Koeman A, van Osch MJ, van der Grond J.

Pediatr Res. 2008 Feb;63(2):158-63.

PMID:
18091357
9.

In vivo biochemical 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance: preliminary results of dGEMRIC, zonal T2, and T2* mapping of articular cartilage.

Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Hughes T, Zilkens C, Quirbach S, Scheffler K, Kraff O, Schweitzer ME, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S.

Invest Radiol. 2008 Sep;43(9):619-26. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9122.

PMID:
18708855
10.

Semiautomatic brain region extraction: a method of parcellating brain regions from structural magnetic resonance images.

Dade LA, Gao FQ, Kovacevic N, Roy P, Rockel C, O'Toole CM, Lobaugh NJ, Feinstein A, Levine B, Black SE.

Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1492-502.

PMID:
15275906
11.

Normal brain volume measurements using multispectral MRI segmentation.

Vaidyanathan M, Clarke LP, Heidtman C, Velthuizen RP, Hall LO.

Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(1):87-97.

PMID:
9084029
12.

Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods.

Klauschen F, Goldman A, Barra V, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Lundervold A.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Apr;30(4):1310-27. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20599.

PMID:
18537111
13.

Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: a multicenter simulation.

Gandy SJ, Waugh SA, Nicholas RS, Simpson HJ, Milne W, Houston JG.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):359-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21401.

PMID:
18666157
14.

Impact of acquisition protocols and processing streams on tissue segmentation of T1 weighted MR images.

Clark KA, Woods RP, Rottenberg DA, Toga AW, Mazziotta JC.

Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):185-202. Epub 2005 Aug 31.

PMID:
16139526
15.

Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.

Mendichovszky IA, Cutajar M, Gordon I.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.025. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

PMID:
19004588
16.

A meta-algorithm for brain extraction in MRI.

Rex DE, Shattuck DW, Woods RP, Narr KL, Luders E, Rehm K, Stoltzner SE, Rottenberg DA, Toga AW.

Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):625-37. Erratum in: Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 15;39(2):913. Stolzner, Sarah E [corrected to Stoltzner, Sarah E].

PMID:
15488412
17.

Clustering of atlas-defined cortical regions based on relaxation times and proton density.

Aubert-Broche B, Grova C, Pike GB, Collins DL.

Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 15;47(2):523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.079. Epub 2009 May 6.

PMID:
19426811
18.

Malignancy assessment of brain tumours with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Fayed N, Dávila J, Medrano J, Olmos S.

Eur J Radiol. 2008 Sep;67(3):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.039. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

PMID:
18442889
19.

Inter- and intraoperator reliability of brain tissue measures using magnetic resonance imaging.

Okugawa G, Takase K, Nobuhara K, Yoshida T, Minami T, Tamagaki C, Magnotta VA, Andreasen NC, Kinoshita T.

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003 Dec;253(6):301-6.

PMID:
14714119
20.

Improvement of the image quality of T1-weighted anatomical brain scans.

Howarth C, Hutton C, Deichmann R.

Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 1;29(3):930-7. Epub 2005 Sep 8.

PMID:
16153861

Supplemental Content

Support Center