Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 134

1.

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.

Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ.

Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):4-6. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

PMID:
17963996
2.

Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity.

Darling ES.

Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):297-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12333. Epub 2014 Jul 4. No abstract available.

PMID:
25039807
3.

Does double-blind review benefit female authors?

Webb TJ, O'Hara B, Freckleton RP.

Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jul;23(7):351-3; author reply 353-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 29. No abstract available.

PMID:
18450323
4.

Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.

Baggs JG, Broome ME, Dougherty MC, Freda MC, Kearney MH.

J Adv Nurs. 2008 Oct;64(2):131-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04816.x. Epub 2008 Sep 1.

PMID:
18764847
5.

[Double-blind peer review].

Fenyvesi T.

Orv Hetil. 2002 Feb 3;143(5):245-8. Hungarian.

PMID:
11875838
6.

Working double-blind.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2008 Feb 7;451(7179):605-6. doi: 10.1038/451605b. No abstract available. Erratum in: Nature. 2008 Jun 5;453(7196):711.

PMID:
18256621
7.

Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.

Anraku A, Jin YP, Trope GE, Buys YM.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1093-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.053. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

PMID:
19376583
8.

Attitudes toward blinding of peer review and perceptions of efficacy within a small biomedical specialty.

Jagsi R, Bennett KE, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Grace C, Holliday E, Zietman AL.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

PMID:
25035195
9.

The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal.

Isenberg SJ, Sanchez E, Zafran KC.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;93(7):881-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.151886. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

PMID:
19211602
10.

Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.

Etemadi A, Raiszadeh F, Alaeddini F, Azizi F.

Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S29-33.

PMID:
14968189
11.

Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.

Kearney MH, Freda MC.

Res Nurs Health. 2005 Dec;28(6):444-52.

PMID:
16287058
12.

The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.

Jones AW.

Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
16784827
13.

Impact of blinded versus unblinded abstract review on scientific program content.

Smith J Jr, Nixon R, Bueschen AJ, Venable DD, Henry HH 2nd.

J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2123-5.

PMID:
12394728
14.

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.

Kowalczuk MK, Dudbridge F, Nanda S, Harriman SL, Patel J, Moylan EC.

BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 29;5(9):e008707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707.

15.

Double-blind peer review: a crucial process.

Lima AF.

J Adhes Dent. 2010 Dec;12(6):423. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a20088. No abstract available.

PMID:
21246062
16.

Authorship in a small medical journal: a study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.

Marusić M, Bozikov J, Katavić V, Hren D, Kljaković-Gaspić M, Marusić A.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Jul;10(3):493-502.

PMID:
15362706
17.

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".

Vinther S, Nielsen OH, Rosenberg J, Keiding N, Schroeder TV.

Dan Med J. 2012 Aug;59(8):A4479.

PMID:
22849979
18.

Reviewers support blinding in peer review.

Tierney AJ.

J Adv Nurs. 2008 Oct;64(2):113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04824.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
18990091
19.

In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.

Peternelj-Taylor C.

J Forensic Nurs. 2010 Winter;6(4):159-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01087.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
21114756
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center