Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 357

1.

Challenges in array comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of cancer samples.

Nowak NJ, Miecznikowski J, Moore SR, Gaile D, Bobadilla D, Smith DD, Kernstine K, Forman SJ, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Reid M, Stoler D, Loree T, Rigual N, Sullivan M, Weiss LM, Hicks D, Slovak ML.

Genet Med. 2007 Sep;9(9):585-95.

PMID:
17873646
2.

Evaluation of Phi29-based whole-genome amplification for microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation.

Arriola E, Lambros MB, Jones C, Dexter T, Mackay A, Tan DS, Tamber N, Fenwick K, Ashworth A, Dowsett M, Reis-Filho JS.

Lab Invest. 2007 Jan;87(1):75-83.

3.

Detection of genomic imbalances in microdissected Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Hartmann S, Martin-Subero JI, Gesk S, Hüsken J, Giefing M, Nagel I, Riemke J, Chott A, Klapper W, Parrens M, Merlio JP, Küppers R, Bräuninger A, Siebert R, Hansmann ML.

Haematologica. 2008 Sep;93(9):1318-26. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12875. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

4.

Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.

Kloth JN, Oosting J, van Wezel T, Szuhai K, Knijnenburg J, Gorter A, Kenter GG, Fleuren GJ, Jordanova ES.

BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 20;8:53.

5.

Detection of DNA copy number alterations in cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Michels E, De Preter K, Van Roy N, Speleman F.

Genet Med. 2007 Sep;9(9):574-84. Review.

PMID:
17873645
6.
7.

Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Tsubosa Y, Sugihara H, Mukaisho K, Kamitani S, Peng DF, Ling ZQ, Tani T, Hattori T.

Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005 Apr 15;158(2):156-66.

PMID:
15796963
8.

Genomic profiling by DNA amplification of laser capture microdissected tissues and array CGH.

Cardoso J, Molenaar L, de Menezes RX, Rosenberg C, Morreau H, Möslein G, Fodde R, Boer JM.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Oct 28;32(19):e146.

9.

Amplifying small amounts of tumor DNA allows detection of DNA copy number abberations with array-CGH.

Prestegarden L, Misra A, Ware ML, Yeh RF, Bjerkvig R, Feuerstein BG.

Biotechniques. 2008 Jun;44(7):Piii-Pvi. doi: 10.2144/000112760.

10.

Large fragment Bst DNA polymerase for whole genome amplification of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Aviel-Ronen S, Qi Zhu C, Coe BP, Liu N, Watson SK, Lam WL, Tsao MS.

BMC Genomics. 2006 Dec 12;7:312.

11.

Oligonucleotide array outperforms SNP array on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded clinical samples.

Nasri S, Anjomshoaa A, Song S, Guilford P, McNoe L, Black M, Phillips V, Reeve A, Humar B.

Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010 Apr 1;198(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.12.002.

PMID:
20303007
12.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplification.

Speicher MR, du Manoir S, Schröck E, Holtgreve-Grez H, Schoell B, Lengauer C, Cremer T, Ried T.

Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Nov;2(11):1907-14.

PMID:
8281155
13.

Use of whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation to detect chromosomal copy number alterations in cell line material and tumour tissue.

Hughes S, Lim G, Beheshti B, Bayani J, Marrano P, Huang A, Squire JA.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;105(1):18-24.

PMID:
15218253
14.

Comparative genomic hybridization using DNA from laser capture microdissected tissue.

Callagy G, Jackson L, Caldas C.

Methods Mol Biol. 2005;293:39-55. Review.

PMID:
16028409
15.

High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Naylor TL, Greshock J, Wang Y, Colligon T, Yu QC, Clemmer V, Zaks TZ, Weber BL.

Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(6):R1186-98. Epub 2005 Nov 24.

16.

Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.

Huang Q, Schantz SP, Rao PH, Mo J, McCormick SA, Chaganti RS.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000 Aug;28(4):395-403.

PMID:
10862048
17.

Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.

Buffart TE, Israeli D, Tijssen M, Vosse SJ, Mrsić A, Meijer GA, Ylstra B.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008 Nov;47(11):994-1004. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20605.

PMID:
18663753
18.

Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets.

Hsu L, Self SG, Grove D, Randolph T, Wang K, Delrow JJ, Loo L, Porter P.

Biostatistics. 2005 Apr;6(2):211-26.

PMID:
15772101
19.

Array comparative genomic hybridization copy number profiling: a new tool for translational research in solid malignancies.

Costa JL, Meijer G, Ylstra B, Caldas C.

Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Apr;18(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.10.005. Review.

PMID:
18314064
20.

1-Mb resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization using a BAC clone set optimized for cancer gene analysis.

Greshock J, Naylor TL, Margolin A, Diskin S, Cleaver SH, Futreal PA, deJong PJ, Zhao S, Liebman M, Weber BL.

Genome Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):179-87. Epub 2003 Dec 12.

Supplemental Content

Support Center