Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 804

1.

Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities.

Solomon D, Stoler M, Jeronimo J, Khan M, Castle P, Schiffman M.

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):288-95.

PMID:
17666602
2.

[Endocervical curretage: an analysis of results in 1997 women].

Li N, Zhang WH, Wu LY, Li AL, Qiao YL, Li L, Pan QJ.

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2004 Jul;26(7):406-8. Chinese.

PMID:
15355644
3.

Endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.

Moniak CW, Kutzner S, Adam E, Harden J, Kaufman RH.

J Reprod Med. 2000 Apr;45(4):285-92.

PMID:
10804483
4.
5.

Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse.

Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, Qiao YL.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):430-4.

PMID:
15343217
6.

Inflation of sensitivity of cervical cancer screening tests secondary to correlated error in colposcopy.

Pretorius RG, Kim RJ, Belinson JL, Elson P, Qiao YL.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2006 Jan;10(1):5-9.

PMID:
16378026
7.

Endocervical curetting vs. endocervical brushing as case finding methods.

Maksem JA.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 May;34(5):313-6.

PMID:
16604549
8.

Endocervical curettage when colposcopic examination is satisfactory and normal.

Williams DL, Dietrich C, McBroom J.

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):801-3.

PMID:
10831970
9.

Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy.

Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Burchette RJ, Hu S, Zhang X, Qiao YL.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Jul;15(3):180-8. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181fb4547.

PMID:
21436729
10.

Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage during colposcopy.

Dreyfus M, Baldauf JJ, Ritter J.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Jan;64(1):101-4.

PMID:
8801132
11.
12.

The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.

Granai CO, Jelen I, Louis F, Kawada CY, Curry SL.

J Reprod Med. 1985 May;30(5):373-5.

PMID:
4009557
14.
15.

Quantifying the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with unsatisfactory colposcopy results.

Massad LS, Tate N, Cejtin E, Collins YC.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005 Jan;9(1):23-8.

PMID:
15870518
16.

Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.

Economos K, Perez Veridiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML.

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):915-8.

PMID:
8497355
17.
18.

[Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade].

Starzewski J, Góźdź S, Chil A, Piasek G, Plutecki J, Smorag L, Dembowska R, Krawczyk J.

Wiad Lek. 2003;56(3-4):162-6. Polish.

PMID:
12923964
19.

Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.

Nakamura Y, Matsumoto K, Satoh T, Nishide K, Nozue A, Shimabukuro K, Endo S, Nagai K, Oki A, Minaguchi T, Morishita Y, Noguchi M, Yoshikawa H.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;20(3):579-85. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0739-6. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

PMID:
25145298
20.

To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains.

Driggers RW, Zahn CM.

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;35(4):583-97; viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.09.007. Review.

PMID:
19061818

Supplemental Content

Support Center