Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 217

1.

Total disk arthroplasty.

Lin EL, Wang JC.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Dec;14(13):705-14. Review.

PMID:
17148618
2.

Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.

Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2905-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b84ae.

PMID:
18246016
3.

Lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Gamradt SC, Wang JC.

Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):95-103. Review.

PMID:
15653090
4.

Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium?

Kishen TJ, Diwan AD.

Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):167-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.002. Review.

PMID:
20399356
5.

Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review.

Resnick DK, Watters WC.

Clin Neurosurg. 2007;54:83-7. Review.

PMID:
18504901
6.

Intervertebral disc arthroplasty.

Anderson PA, Rouleau JP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2779-86. Review.

PMID:
15564927
7.

Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment.

German JW, Foley KT.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16 Suppl):S60-7. Review.

PMID:
16103835
8.

Lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Errico TJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jun;(435):106-17. Review.

PMID:
15930927
9.
10.

Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.

Acosta FL Jr, Ames CP.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;16(4):603-7, vi. Review.

PMID:
16326283
11.

The Charité Artificial Disc: insertion technique.

Aryan HE, Acosta FL Jr, Ames CP.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;16(4):637-50, vii.

PMID:
16326287
12.

Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.

Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):123-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816043af.

PMID:
18197095
13.

General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C.

Chi JH, Ames CP, Tay B.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;16(4):609-19, vi. Review.

PMID:
16326284
14.

Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.

Huang RC, Girardi FP, Lim MR, Cammisa FP Jr.

Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):263-9. Review.

PMID:
15950686
15.

Why a mechanical disc?

Errico TJ.

Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):151S-157S. Review.

PMID:
15541660
16.

[Replacement of lumbosacral intervertebral disks using artificial prostheses: surgical tactics and technique].

Konovalov NA, Shevelev IN, Kungurtsev VV, Zelenkov PV, Nazarenko AG.

Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2008 Jul-Sep;(3):25-30; discussion 30-1. Russian.

PMID:
19062592
17.
18.

Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.

Schulte TL, Lerner T, Hackenberg L, Liljenqvist U, Bullmann V.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 15;32(22):E645-8.

PMID:
18090074
19.

Cervical disc replacement.

Phillips FM, Garfin SR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17 Suppl):S27-33. Review.

PMID:
16138062
20.

The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement.

McAfee PC.

Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):177S-181S. Review.

PMID:
15541664

Supplemental Content

Support Center