Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level.

Runyon MS, Richman PB, Kline JA; Pulmonary Embolism Research Consortium Study Group.

Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):53-7. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

3.

International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule.

Eagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, Brehaut J, Taljaard M, Kelly AM, Mason S, Kellermann A, Perry JJ.

Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00265.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

4.

Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.

Lucassen W, Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Reitsma JB, Moons KG, B├╝ller H, van Weert HC.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):448-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007. Review.

PMID:
21969343
5.

Pediatric emergency physician opinions on ankle radiograph clinical decision rules.

Boutis K, Constantine E, Schuh S, Pecaric M, Stephens D, Narayanan UG.

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;17(7):709-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00787.x.

6.

Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?

Chunilal SD, Eikelboom JW, Attia J, Miniati M, Panju AA, Simel DL, Ginsberg JS.

JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2849-58. Review.

PMID:
14657070
7.

Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.

Raja AS, Greenberg JO, Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Fitterman N, Schuur JD; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-1772. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

PMID:
26414967
8.

Pretest risk assessment in suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Weiss CR, Haponik EF, Diette GB, Merriman B, Scatarige JC, Fishman EK.

Acad Radiol. 2008 Jan;15(1):3-14.

PMID:
18078902
9.

Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.

Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Wood TJ, Taljaard M, Eagles D, Lott A, Clement C, Kelly AM, Mason S, Stiell IG.

Med Decis Making. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):398-408. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09344747. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

PMID:
20042533
10.

An international study of emergency physicians' practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule.

Perry JJ, Eagles D, Clement CM, Brehaut J, Kelly AM, Mason S, Stiell IG.

CJEM. 2009 Nov;11(6):516-22.

PMID:
19922710
11.

Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography.

Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, O'Connor AM, Wells GA.

Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):134-40.

12.

Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?

Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, McAuley L, Howell M, Clancy M, Durieux P, Simon N, Emparanza JI, Aginaga JR, O'connor A, Wells G.

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;37(3):259-66.

PMID:
11223761
13.

Role of physician perception of patient smile on pretest probability assessment for acute pulmonary embolism.

Kline JA, Neumann D, Hall CL, Capito J.

Emerg Med J. 2017 Feb;34(2):82-88. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205874. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

PMID:
27485261
14.

Emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes of clinical decision support in the electronic health record: a survey-based study.

Ballard DW, Rauchwerger AS, Reed ME, Vinson DR, Mark DG, Offerman SR, Chettipally UK, Graetz I, Dayan P, Kuppermann N; Kaiser Permanente CREST Network.

Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):352-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12109.

15.

Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice.

Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Visentin L, Graham ID.

Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):948-56. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

16.

Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (the PERC rule) combined with low clinical probability in high prevalence population.

Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Dambrine S, Zech F, Thys F, Roy PM.

Thromb Res. 2012 May;129(5):e189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

PMID:
22424852
17.

The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Rodger MA, Maser E, Stiell I, Howley HE, Wells PS.

Thromb Res. 2005;116(2):101-7. Epub 2004 Nov 18.

PMID:
15907523
18.

Theory of planned behaviour can help understand processes underlying the use of two emergency medicine diagnostic imaging rules.

Perez R, Brehaut JC, Taljaard M, Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw J.

Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 7;9:88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0088-x.

19.

Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule.

Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Graham ID.

Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):413-20. Epub 2006 Mar 10.

20.

Does clinical decision support reduce unwarranted variation in yield of CT pulmonary angiogram?

Prevedello LM, Raja AS, Ip IK, Sodickson A, Khorasani R.

Am J Med. 2013 Nov;126(11):975-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.04.018.

Supplemental Content

Support Center