Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.

Wilensky GR.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w572-85. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

2.

The emerging context for advances in comparative effectiveness assessment.

Rowe JW, Cortese DA, McGinnis JM.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w593-5. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

3.

Can a center for comparative effectiveness information succeed? Perspectives from a health care company.

Buto K, Juhn P.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w586-8. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

4.

Getting to 'smart' health care.

Clancy CM.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w589-92. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

5.

Care to compare?

Aston G.

Hosp Health Netw. 2008 Dec;82(12):38-41, 1.

PMID:
19209502
6.

Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future.

Eisenberg JM, Zarin D.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Spring;18(2):192-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
12053419
7.

Guest Editorial: Intersections for mutual success in nursing and health services research.

Clancy C, Sharp BA, Hubbard HB.

Nurs Outlook. 2005 Nov-Dec;53(6):263-5. Review. No abstract available. Erratum in: Nurs Outlook. 2006 May-Jun;54(3):121.

PMID:
16360691
8.

Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine.

Sox HC, Greenfield S.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):203-5. Epub 2009 Jun 30. No abstract available.

PMID:
19567618
9.

Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Medicare coverage assessment.

Dubinsky M, Ferguson JH.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(3):480-8.

PMID:
2228460
10.

Too many cooks batter technology assessment.

Wagner M.

Mod Healthc. 1991 Dec 2;21(48):29-33, 36-8, 42.

PMID:
10115255
11.

Centers tapped to evaluate technology.

Moore JD Jr.

Mod Healthc. 1997 Sep 22;27(38):20, 22. No abstract available.

PMID:
10170392
12.

The federal role in health technology assessment.

Holohan TV.

Lancet. 1996 Oct 12;348(9033):1006-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
8855864
13.

The role of the private sector in monitoring health care quality and patient safety.

Blewett LA, Parente ST, Peterson E, Finch MD.

Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Aug;29(8):425-33.

PMID:
12953607
14.

Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report.

Sox HC.

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 5;153(7):469-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00269. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

PMID:
20679544
15.

Outcomes and effectiveness research in the private sector.

Mendelson DN, Goodman CS, Ahn R, Rubin RJ.

Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Sep-Oct;17(5):75-90. Review.

16.

Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process.

Fernandez AM, Schrogie JJ, Wilson WW, Nash DB.

Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Nov-Dec;2(6):240-53. Review.

PMID:
9543920
17.

Review of medical technology policies shows need, opportunities for changes.

Banta D.

Hospitals. 1982 Apr 1;56(7):87-90. No abstract available.

PMID:
6800914
18.

A national policy for health care technology assessment.

Perry S, Pillar B.

Med Care Rev. 1990 Winter;47(4):401-17. No abstract available.

PMID:
10113012
19.

More on health care and the law.

Epstein RA.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):245-6. No abstract available.

20.

Comparative effectiveness research - what is it and how does one do it?

Goss CH, Tefft N.

Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013 Sep;14(3):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

PMID:
23890806

Supplemental Content

Support Center