Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update.

Coindre JM.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Oct;130(10):1448-53. Review.

PMID:
17090186
2.

Validity and reproducibility of histologic diagnosis and grading for adult soft-tissue sarcomas.

Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S, Nojima T, Hirose T, Nikaido T, Yamashiro K, Matsuno Y.

Hum Pathol. 2002 Jan;33(1):111-5.

PMID:
11823981
3.

Nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas of childhood: formulation of a simplified system for grading.

Parham DM, Webber BL, Jenkins JJ 3rd, Cantor AB, Maurer HM.

Mod Pathol. 1995 Sep;8(7):705-10.

PMID:
8539226
4.

Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems.

Oliveira AM, Nascimento AG.

Skeletal Radiol. 2001 Oct;30(10):543-59. Review.

PMID:
11685477
5.
7.

Problems in grading soft tissue sarcomas.

Brown FM, Fletcher CD.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 Nov;114 Suppl:S82-9. Review.

PMID:
11996174
8.

Accuracy of cytological grading of spindle-cell sarcomas.

Mathur S, Kapila K, Verma K.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Aug;29(2):79-83.

PMID:
12889044
9.

Is fine-needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients.

Kilpatrick SE, Cappellari JO, Bos GD, Gold SH, Ward WG.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jan;115(1):59-68.

PMID:
11190808
10.

Sampling modality influences the predictive value of grading in adult soft tissue extremity sarcomas.

Khoja H, Griffin A, Dickson B, Wunder J, Ferguson P, Howarth D, Kandel R.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Dec;137(12):1774-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0427-OA.

PMID:
24283858
11.

Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk.

Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S, Yokoyama R, Umeda T, Matsuno Y, Hirohashi S.

Cancer. 2002 Aug 15;95(4):843-51.

12.

Histological grading and MIB-1 labeling index of soft-tissue sarcomas.

Hasegawa T.

Pathol Int. 2007 Mar;57(3):121-5. Review.

PMID:
17295643
13.

Modified staging system for extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

Ramanathan RC, A'Hern R, Fisher C, Thomas JM.

Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Jan-Feb;6(1):57-69.

PMID:
10030416
14.

Histological diagnosis and grading of soft-tissue sarcomas.

Leyvraz S, Costa J.

Semin Surg Oncol. 1988;4(1):3-6.

PMID:
3353621
15.

Analysis of clinicopathologic prognostic factors for 157 uterine sarcomas and evaluation of a grading score validated for soft tissue sarcoma.

Pautier P, Genestie C, Rey A, Morice P, Roche B, Lhommé C, Haie-Meder C, Duvillard P.

Cancer. 2000 Mar 15;88(6):1425-31.

PMID:
10717626
16.

Histologic grading of adult soft tissue sarcomas.

Coindre JM.

Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1998;82:59-63. Review.

PMID:
10095417
17.

Core-needle biopsy performed by the cytopathologist: a technique to complement fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue and bone lesions.

Domanski HA, Akerman M, Carlén B, Engellau J, Gustafson P, Jonsson K, Mertens F, Rydholm A.

Cancer. 2005 Aug 25;105(4):229-39.

18.

The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases.

Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E, Rosenberg SA.

Cancer. 1984 Feb 1;53(3):530-41.

19.

Extremity soft tissue sarcomas: analysis of prognostic variables in 300 cases and evaluation of tumor necrosis as a factor in stratifying higher-grade sarcomas.

Lack EE, Steinberg SM, White DE, Kinsella T, Glatstein E, Chang AE, Rosenberg SA.

J Surg Oncol. 1989 Aug;41(4):263-73.

PMID:
2755144
20.

Prognostic significance of histologic parameters of soft tissue sarcomas.

Hashimoto H, Daimaru Y, Takeshita S, Tsuneyoshi M, Enjoji M.

Cancer. 1992 Dec 15;70(12):2816-22.

Supplemental Content

Support Center