Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 170

1.

Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.

Jørgensen AW, Hilden J, Gøtzsche PC.

BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):782. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Review.

2.

Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusions.

Jørgensen AW, Maric KL, Tendal B, Faurschou A, Gøtzsche PC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Sep 9;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-60.

3.

[Cochrane reviews compared with industry-supported and other meta-analyses of the same drugs--secondary publication].

Jørgensen AW, Hilden J, Gøtzsche PC.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Nov 27;168(48):4218-20. Danish.

PMID:
17147949
4.

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.

PMID:
17205029
5.
6.

Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.

Hart B, Lundh A, Bero L.

BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d7202. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7202.

PMID:
22214754
7.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation.

Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP, Booker L, Sigouin C, Fuentes M, Stevens R.

BMJ. 2000 Feb 26;320(7234):537-40. Erratum in: BMJ 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):984. BMJ 2000 Jul 29;321(7256):275.

8.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
9.

Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: a systematic approach.

Popelut A, Valet F, Fromentin O, Thomas A, Bouchard P.

PLoS One. 2010 Apr 21;5(4):e10274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010274.

10.

Methodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.

Lane PW, Higgins JP, Anagnostelis B, Anzures-Cabrera J, Baker NF, Cappelleri JC, Haughie S, Hollis S, Lewis SC, Moneuse P, Whitehead A.

Res Synth Methods. 2013 Dec;4(4):342-50. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1072. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

PMID:
26053947
11.
12.

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.

Windsor B, Popovich I, Jordan V, Showell M, Shea B, Farquhar C.

Hum Reprod. 2012 Dec;27(12):3460-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des342. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23034152
13.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

14.

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.

Pildal J, Hróbjartsson A, Jørgensen KJ, Hilden J, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC.

Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;36(4):847-57. Epub 2007 May 21. Erratum in: Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;37(2):422.

PMID:
17517809
15.

Authors' reply on Cochrane reviews v industry supported meta-analyses.

Jørgensen AW, Gøtzsche PC, Hilden J.

BMJ. 2006 Nov 18;333(7577):1072-3. No abstract available.

16.

Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.

Afshari A.

Dan Med Bull. 2011 Sep;58(9):B4316. Review.

PMID:
21893014
17.

Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: quality of systematic reviews.

de Bot CM, Moed H, Berger MY, Röder E, van Wijk RG, van der Wouden JC.

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Sep;22(6):548-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01165.x. Review.

PMID:
21919934
18.

Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.

Ford AC, Guyatt GH, Talley NJ, Moayyedi P.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):280-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.658. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19920807
19.

Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Abbate A, Testa L, Remigi E, Burzotta F, Valgimigli M, Romagnoli E, Crea F, Agostoni P.

BMJ. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):202-9. Epub 2006 Jan 16. Review.

20.

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998.

Olsen O, Middleton P, Ezzo J, Gøtzsche PC, Hadhazy V, Herxheimer A, Kleijnen J, McIntosh H.

BMJ. 2001 Oct 13;323(7317):829-32.

Supplemental Content

Support Center