Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 699

1.
2.

Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients.

Coopey SB, Buckley JM, Smith BL, Hughes KS, Gadd MA, Specht MC.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3036-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1909-7. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

PMID:
21947583
3.

The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.

Rizzo M, Iyengar R, Gabram SG, Park J, Birdsong G, Chandler KL, Mosunjac MB.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;17(1):228-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0643-x. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

PMID:
19636625
4.

A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.

Gibson GR, Lesnikoski BA, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ Jr.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 Oct;8(9):693-704.

PMID:
11597009
6.
7.

Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Caughran JL, Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Dekhne NS, Benitez PR, Goldstein NS.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov;16(11):3020-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0628-9. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

PMID:
19636632
8.

The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.

Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Ruthazer R, DiPetrillo T, Boyle T, Kanski J, Safaii H.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Nov 1;45(4):885-91.

PMID:
10571194
9.

Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.

Fleming FJ, Hill AD, Mc Dermott EW, O'Doherty A, O'Higgins NJ, Quinn CM.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Apr;30(3):233-7.

PMID:
15028301
10.

Long-term cosmesis after lumpectomy and brachytherapy in the management of carcinoma of the previously irradiated breast.

Trombetta M, Julian TB, Werts DE, McWilliams W, Kim Y, Miften M, Parda D.

Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun;32(3):314-8. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31818af0b9.

PMID:
19451803
11.

Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.

Dzierzanowski M, Melville KA, Barnes PJ, MacIntosh RF, Caines JS, Porter GA.

J Surg Oncol. 2005 May 1;90(2):71-6.

PMID:
15844190
12.

Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?

Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Feldman SM.

Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007.

PMID:
18809063
13.

Patient age and positive margins are predictive factors of residual tumor on mastectomy specimen after conservative treatment for breast cancer.

Voguet L, Hébert T, Levêque J, Acker O, Mesbah H, Marret H, Porée P, Body G.

Breast. 2009 Aug;18(4):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

PMID:
19628389
14.

Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.

Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Xie XJ, Yan J, Euhus D, Peng Y, Sarode V, Moldrem A, Marilyn Leitch A, Andrews V, Stallings C, Rao R.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1349-55. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1420-6. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

PMID:
21046260
15.

The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden.

Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, Ruthazer R, Kramer B, Safaii H, Graham R.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 May 1;38(2):291-9.

PMID:
9226315
16.

The effect of intraoperative specimen inking on lumpectomy re-excision rates.

Singh M, Singh G, Hogan KT, Atkins KA, Schroen AT.

World J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan 18;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-8-4.

17.

The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.

O'Sullivan MJ, Li T, Freedman G, Morrow M.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3133-40. Epub 2007 Jul 26.

PMID:
17653798
18.

The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.

Coopey S, Smith BL, Hanson S, Buckley J, Hughes KS, Gadd M, Specht MC.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3797-801. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1802-4. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

PMID:
21630123
19.

Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.

Olson TP, Harter J, Muñoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin T.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2953-60. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

PMID:
17674109
20.

Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.

Merrill AL, Coopey SB, Tang R, McEvoy MP, Specht MC, Hughes KS, Gadd MA, Smith BL.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):729-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

PMID:
26467458

Supplemental Content

Support Center