Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 225

1.

Personality in cyberspace: personal Web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions.

Marcus B, Machilek F, Schütz A.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;90(6):1014-31.

PMID:
16784349
2.

Narcissism and social networking Web sites.

Buffardi LE, Campbell WK.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Oct;34(10):1303-14. doi: 10.1177/0146167208320061. Epub 2008 Jul 3.

PMID:
18599659
4.

e-Perceptions: personality impressions based on personal websites.

Vazire S, Gosling SD.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):123-32.

PMID:
15250797
5.

Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers.

Gosling SD, John OP, Craik KH, Robins RW.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1337-49.

PMID:
9599447
6.

Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.

Beer A, Watson D.

J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):535-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

PMID:
18399954
7.

A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms.

Gosling SD, Ko SJ, Mannarelli T, Morris ME.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Mar;82(3):379-98.

PMID:
11902623
9.
10.

Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism.

Miller JD, Campbell WK.

J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):449-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00492.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

PMID:
18399956
11.
13.

Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web.

Buchanan T, Smith JL.

Br J Psychol. 1999 Feb;90 ( Pt 1):125-44.

PMID:
10085550
14.

Privacy and health in the information age: a content analysis of health web site privacy policy statements.

Rains SA, Bosch LA.

Health Commun. 2009 Jul;24(5):435-46. doi: 10.1080/10410230903023485.

PMID:
19657826
15.

Personality judgment at zero acquaintance: agreement, assumed similarity, and implicit simplicity.

Beer A, Watson D.

J Pers Assess. 2008 May;90(3):250-60. doi: 10.1080/00223890701884970.

PMID:
18444121
16.

The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20.

Soto CJ, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):718-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718.

PMID:
18361680
17.
18.

Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the big five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7.

Measelle JR, John OP, Ablow JC, Cowan PA, Cowan CP.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jul;89(1):90-106.

PMID:
16060748
19.

Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior.

Hirsh JB, Deyoung CG, Peterson JB.

J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):1085-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00575.x. Epub 2009 May 19.

PMID:
19558442
20.

Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis.

Feingold A.

Psychol Bull. 1994 Nov;116(3):429-56.

PMID:
7809307

Supplemental Content

Support Center