Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule.

Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Graham ID.

Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):413-20. Epub 2006 Mar 10.

2.

The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.

Vaillancourt C, Stiell IG, Beaudoin T, Maloney J, Anton AR, Bradford P, Cain E, Travers A, Stempien M, Lees M, Munkley D, Battram E, Banek J, Wells GA.

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):663-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 24. Erratum in: Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;55(1):22.

PMID:
19394111
3.

Can emergency nurses use the Canadian cervical spine rule to reduce unnecessary patient immobilisation?

Miller P, Coffey F, Reid AM, Stevenson K.

Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jul;14(3):133-40. Epub 2006 May 30.

PMID:
16730989
4.

International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule.

Eagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, Brehaut J, Taljaard M, Kelly AM, Mason S, Kellermann A, Perry JJ.

Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00265.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

5.
6.

Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice.

Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Visentin L, Graham ID.

Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):948-56. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

7.

Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.

Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Wood TJ, Taljaard M, Eagles D, Lott A, Clement C, Kelly AM, Mason S, Stiell IG.

Med Decis Making. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):398-408. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09344747. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

PMID:
20042533
8.

Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography.

Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, O'Connor AM, Wells GA.

Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):134-40.

9.

Implementation of clinical decision rules in the emergency department.

Stiell IG, Bennett C.

Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):955-9. Epub 2007 Oct 8.

10.

The Canadian C-spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment.

Bandiera G, Stiell IG, Wells GA, Clement C, De Maio V, Vandemheen KL, Greenberg GH, Lesiuk H, Brison R, Cass D, Dreyer J, Eisenhauer MA, Macphail I, McKnight RD, Morrison L, Reardon M, Schull M, Worthington J; Canadian C-Spine and CT Head Study Group.

Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;42(3):395-402.

PMID:
12944893
11.

Pediatric emergency physician opinions on ankle radiograph clinical decision rules.

Boutis K, Constantine E, Schuh S, Pecaric M, Stephens D, Narayanan UG.

Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;17(7):709-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00787.x.

12.

International survey of emergency physicians' priorities for clinical decision rules.

Eagles D, Stiell IG, Clement CM, Brehaut J, Kelly AM, Mason S, Kellermann A, Perry JJ.

Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;15(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00035.x.

14.

Print format and sender recognition were related to survey completion rate.

Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Visentin L, Stiell IG.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;59(6):635-41. Epub 2006 May 2.

PMID:
16713527
15.

Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department.

Stiell IG, Clement CM, O'Connor A, Davies B, Leclair C, Sheehan P, Clavet T, Beland C, MacKenzie T, Wells GA.

CMAJ. 2010 Aug 10;182(11):1173-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091430. Epub 2010 May 10.

16.

Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?

Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, McAuley L, Howell M, Clancy M, Durieux P, Simon N, Emparanza JI, Aginaga JR, O'connor A, Wells G.

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;37(3):259-66.

PMID:
11223761
17.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma: a meta-analysis.

Muchow RD, Resnick DK, Abdel MP, Munoz A, Anderson PA.

J Trauma. 2008 Jan;64(1):179-89. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000238664.74117.ac.

PMID:
18188119
18.

How accurate is the Canadian C-spine rule for the detection of clinically significant cervical spine injuries?

Kinkade MT, Lindbloom EJ.

J Fam Pract. 2002 Jan;51(1):10. No abstract available.

PMID:
11927052
19.

Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale.

Canadian CT Head and C-Spine (CCC) Study Group.

CJEM. 2002 Mar;4(2):84-90.

PMID:
17612425
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center