Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 85

1.

Revisiting the relation between change and initial value: a review and evaluation.

Tu YK, Gilthorpe MS.

Stat Med. 2007 Jan 30;26(2):443-57.

PMID:
16526009
2.

The problem of analysing the relationship between change and initial value in oral health research.

Tu YK, Baelum V, Gilthorpe MS.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Aug;113(4):271-8.

PMID:
16048518
3.

Methods for assessing whether change depends on initial value.

Hayes RJ.

Stat Med. 1988 Sep;7(9):915-27.

PMID:
3175391
4.

The relationship between baseline value and its change: problems in categorization and the proposal of a new method.

Tu YK, Baelum V, Gilthorpe MS.

Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Aug;113(4):279-88. Review.

PMID:
16048519
5.

Revisiting the relation between change and initial value: a review and evaluation by Yu-Kang Tu and Mark S. Gilthorpe, Statistics in Medicine 2006; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2538.

Funatogawa I, Funatogawa T.

Stat Med. 2007 Jul 20;26(16):3205-6; author reply 3206-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
17066371
6.

Ignorability and bias in clinical trials.

Heitjan DF.

Stat Med. 1999 Sep 15-30;18(17-18):2421-34.

PMID:
10474150
8.
9.

Methodologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited, but still identify major concerns.

Ferreira-González I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Busse JW, Bryant DM, Montori VM, Alonso-Coello P, Walter SD, Guyatt GH.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;60(7):651-7; discussion 658-62. Epub 2007 Feb 23. Review.

PMID:
17573977
10.

Estimation of the intervention effect in a non-randomized study with pre- and post-mismeasured binary responses.

Lin HM, Lyles RH, Williamson JM, Kunselman AR.

Stat Med. 2005 Feb 15;24(3):419-35.

PMID:
15543548
11.

Interpretation of clinical trial results.

Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5 Suppl):S114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.037. Review.

PMID:
19007606
12.

Beyond effect size: consideration of the minimum effect size of interest in anesthesia trials.

Gibbs NM, Weightman WM.

Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):471-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823d2ab7. No abstract available.

PMID:
22266696
13.
15.

Statistical issues on the analysis of change in follow-up studies in dental research.

Blance A, Tu YK, Baelum V, Gilthorpe MS.

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;35(6):412-20.

PMID:
18039282
16.

A critique of recent research on the two-treatment crossover design.

Fleiss JL.

Control Clin Trials. 1989 Sep;10(3):237-43. Review.

PMID:
2676339
17.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
18.

PC program for assessing the relationship between rate of change and initial value.

Kowalski CJ, Schneiderman ED, Willis SM.

Comput Biol Med. 1994 Nov;24(6):485-92.

19.

Interaction effects and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: more than meets the eye?

Sevdalis N, Jacklin R.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):919-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00872.x. Epub 2008 Mar 24. Review.

PMID:
18373582
20.

[The origin of informed consent].

Mallardi V.

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Italian.

PMID:
16602332

Supplemental Content

Support Center