Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 82

1.

Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures.

Killeen SD, O'Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP.

Br J Surg. 2005 Apr;92(4):389-402. Review.

PMID:
15786424
2.
3.

A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A.

Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):145-61. Review.

PMID:
17256810
4.

Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR.

Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):511-20. Review.

PMID:
12230353
5.

Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.

Schrag D, Earle C, Xu F, Panageas KS, Yabroff KR, Bristow RE, Trimble EL, Warren JL.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Feb 1;98(3):163-71.

PMID:
16449676
6.

[Relationship between volume and quality of care for surgical interventions; results of a literature review].

Burgers JS, Wittenberg J, Kallewaard M, van Croonenborg JJ, van Barneveld TA, van Everdingen JJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Sep 22;151(38):2105-10. Dutch.

PMID:
17948827
7.

Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country.

Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lee HC, Chai CY.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1182-8. Epub 2006 Aug 5.

PMID:
16897270
8.

Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Bilimoria KY, Phillips JD, Rock CE, Hayman A, Prystowsky JB, Bentrem DJ.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1799-808. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0467-8. Epub 2009 May 15. Review.

PMID:
19444524
9.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for lower limb arterial surgery.

Awopetu AI, Moxey P, Hinchliffe RJ, Jones KG, Thompson MM, Holt PJ.

Br J Surg. 2010 Jun;97(6):797-803. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7089. Review.

PMID:
20473990
10.

An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome.

Committee for Scientific Affairs, Kazui T, Osada H, Fujita H.

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;55(12):483-92. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

PMID:
18066639
11.

The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Kressner M, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Damber L, Lindmark G, Ojerskog B, Sjödahl R, Johansson R, Påhlman L.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Sep;52(9):1542-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181af58f4.

PMID:
19690480
12.

Relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review.

Henebiens M, van den Broek TA, Vahl AC, Koelemay MJ.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):285-92. Epub 2006 Nov 28. Review.

13.

Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer.

Ptok H, Marusch F, Kuhn R, Gastinger I, Lippert H.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Sep;33(7):854-61.

PMID:
17933024
14.

Volume and outcome for major upper GI surgery in England.

Pal N, Axisa B, Yusof S, Newcombe RG, Wemyss-Holden S, Rhodes M, Lewis MP.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):353-7.

PMID:
17805936
15.

Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspective.

Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K; Japan Surgical Society.

Surg Today. 2009;39(8):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3848-x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.

PMID:
19639432
16.

The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy.

Joudi FN, Konety BR.

J Urol. 2005 Aug;174(2):432-8.

PMID:
16006859
17.

Assessing the quality of the volume-outcome relationship in uro-oncology.

Mayer EK, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Vale JA.

BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(3):341-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08021.x. Epub 2008 Oct 16. Review.

18.

Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review.

Shervin N, Rubash HE, Katz JN.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Apr;457:35-41. Review.

PMID:
17415062
19.

Regionalization of hepatic resections is associated with increasing disparities among some patient populations in use of high-volume providers.

Scarborough JE, Pietrobon R, Clary BM, Marroquin CE, Bennett KM, Kuo PC, Pappas TN.

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Dec;207(6):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Aug 30.

PMID:
19183528
20.

Patient volume affects outcome in critically ill patients.

Metnitz B, Metnitz PG, Bauer P, Valentin A; ASDI Study Group.

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(1-2):34-40. doi: 10.1007/s00508-008-1019-0.

PMID:
19263012

Supplemental Content

Support Center