Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States.

Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Ballard-Barbash R, Cutter GR, Barlow WE.

Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):363-73.

PMID:
15670994
2.

Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.

PMID:
15741572
3.

Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.

Yankaskas BC, Haneuse S, Kapp JM, Kerlikowske K, Geller B, Buist DS; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 19;102(10):692-701. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq090. Epub 2010 May 3.

4.

Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].

Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan.

5.

Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.

Taplin SH, Abraham L, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Buist DS, Smith-Bindman R, Lehman C, Weaver D, Carney PA, Barlow WE.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 21;102(14):1040-51. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq233. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

6.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

7.

Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.

Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Anderson ML, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Brenner RJ; National Cancer Institute-sponsored Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):74-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091881. Epub 2010 May 26.

8.

The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Durham DD, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):278-89. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

9.
10.

National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Lehman CD, Arao RF, Sprague BL, Lee JM, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Henderson LM, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Rauscher GH, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):49-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

PMID:
27918707
11.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):72-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101698. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

12.

Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer.

Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y, Ballard-Barbash R, Yankaskas BC, Cutter GR, Carney PA, Geller BM, Rosenberg R, Kerlikowske K, Weaver DL, Taplin SH.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1151-9.

PMID:
12165640
13.

Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn172. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

14.

National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Sprague BL, Arao RF, Miglioretti DL, Henderson LM, Buist DS, Onega T, Rauscher GH, Lee JM, Tosteson AN, Kerlikowske K, Lehman CD; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):59-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161519. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

PMID:
28244803
15.

Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.

Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, Sickles EA, Lehman CD, Geller BM, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Weaver DL, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R.

Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):55-66. Erratum in: Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):620.

PMID:
16990671
16.

Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1.

17.

Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K.

JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. Erratum in: JAMA. 2004 Feb 18;291(7):824.

PMID:
14570948
18.

Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use.

Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Kopans DB, Moore R, Halpern EF, Hughes KS, Smith BL, Tanabe KK, Michaelson JS.

Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):335-42.

PMID:
16864665
19.
20.

Effect of observing change from comparison mammograms on performance of screening mammography in a large community-based population.

Yankaskas BC, May RC, Matuszewski J, Bowling JM, Jarman MP, Schroeder BF.

Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):762-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110653. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

Supplemental Content

Support Center