Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

A comparison of Monte Carlo and Fermi-Eyges-Hogstrom estimates of heart and lung dose from breast electron boost treatment.

Coleman J, Park C, Villarreal-Barajas JE, Petti P, Faddegon B.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):621-8.

PMID:
15667984
2.

AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.

Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax I.

Radiother Oncol. 2009 Oct;93(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19541380
3.

[Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].

Huang XB, Jiang GL, Chen JY, Chen LF, Hu WG.

Ai Zheng. 2006 Jul;25(7):855-60. Chinese.

PMID:
16831277
4.

Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.

Paelinck L, Reynaert N, Thierens H, De Neve W, De Wagter C.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 May 7;50(9):2055-69. Epub 2005 Apr 20.

PMID:
15843736
5.

SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.

Panettieri V, Wennberg B, Gagliardi G, Duch MA, Ginjaume M, Lax I.

Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 21;52(14):4265-81. Epub 2007 Jun 20.

PMID:
17664607
6.

Comparison of conventional inserts and an add-on electron MLC for chest wall irradiation of left-sided breast cancer.

Vatanen T, Traneus E, Lahtinen T.

Acta Oncol. 2009;48(3):446-51. doi: 10.1080/02841860802477907.

PMID:
18932098
7.

A dosimetric analysis comparing electron beam with the MammoSite brachytherapy applicator for intact breast boost.

Shah AP, Strauss JB, Kirk MC, Chen SS, Dickler A.

Phys Med. 2010 Apr;26(2):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.08.004.

PMID:
19836283
8.

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer using the Intrabeam system.

Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Scheda A, Steil V, Hermann B, Kehrer T, Bauer L, Melchert F, Wenz F.

Tumori. 2005 Jul-Aug;91(4):339-45.

PMID:
16277101
9.

Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Dogan N, Mihaylov I, Wu Y, Keall PJ, Siebers JV, Hagan MP.

Radiat Oncol. 2009 Jun 15;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-18.

10.

The effect of finite patient dimensions and tissue inhomogeneities on dosimetry planning of 192Ir HDR breast brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo dose verification study.

Pantelis E, Papagiannis P, Karaiskos P, Angelopoulos A, Anagnostopoulos G, Baltas D, Zamboglou N, Sakelliou L.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1596-602.

PMID:
15817368
11.

Comparison of planned dose distributions calculated by Monte Carlo and Ray-Trace algorithms for the treatment of lung tumors with cyberknife: a preliminary study in 33 patients.

Wilcox EE, Daskalov GM, Lincoln H, Shumway RC, Kaplan BM, Colasanto JM.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

PMID:
20004530
12.

The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.

Chetty IJ, Rosu M, McShan DL, Fraass BA, Ten Haken RK.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 Mar 7;50(5):801-15. Epub 2005 Feb 17.

13.

Optimization of combined electron and photon beams for breast cancer.

Xiong W, Li J, Chen L, Price RA, Freedman G, Ding M, Qin L, Yang J, Ma CM.

Phys Med Biol. 2004 May 21;49(10):1973-89.

PMID:
15214536
14.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy with electrons using algorithm based energy/range selection methods.

Olofsson L, Mu X, Nill S, Oelfke U, Zackrisson B, Karlsson M.

Radiother Oncol. 2004 Nov;73(2):223-31.

PMID:
15542170
15.

Modulated electron radiotherapy treatment planning using a photon multileaf collimator for post-mastectomized chest walls.

Salguero FJ, Palma B, Arrans R, Rosello J, Leal A.

Radiother Oncol. 2009 Dec;93(3):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Sep 14.

PMID:
19758721
16.

[Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].

Treutwein M, Bogner L.

Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Aug;183(8):454-8. German.

PMID:
17680226
17.

A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.

Ding GX, Cygler JE, Yu CW, Kalach NI, Daskalov G.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):622-33.

PMID:
16168854
18.
19.
20.

Comparison of photon with electron boost in treatment of early stage breast cancer.

Kovacs A, Hadjiev J, Lakosi F, Glavak C, Antal G, Bogner P, Horvath A, Repa I.

Pathol Oncol Res. 2008 Jun;14(2):193-7. doi: 10.1007/s12253-008-9015-2. Epub 2008 Mar 15.

PMID:
18347930

Supplemental Content

Support Center