Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 90

1.

Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians.

Evans R, Elwyn G, Edwards A.

BMJ. 2004 May 22;328(7450):1240. Review.

2.
3.

Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.

Overeem K, Wollersheim HC, Arah OA, Cruijsberg JK, Grol RP, Lombarts KM.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 26;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-80.

4.

The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review.

Donnon T, Al Ansari A, Al Alawi S, Violato C.

Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):511-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000147. Review.

5.

A review of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding assessment tools.

Ho YJ, McGrath JM.

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;39(4):386-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01153.x. Review.

PMID:
20629926
6.

Reliability and validity of student peer assessment in medical education: a systematic review.

Speyer R, Pilz W, Van Der Kruis J, Brunings JW.

Med Teach. 2011;33(11):e572-85. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610835. Review.

PMID:
22022910
7.

Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review.

Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, Elwyn G, Lombarts KM, Wollersheim HC, Grol RP.

Med Educ. 2007 Nov;41(11):1039-49. Review.

PMID:
17973764
8.

Nurse Competence Scale: a systematic and psychometric review.

Flinkman M, Leino-Kilpi H, Numminen O, Jeon Y, Kuokkanen L, Meretoja R.

J Adv Nurs. 2017 May;73(5):1035-1050. doi: 10.1111/jan.13183. Epub 2016 Nov 7. Review.

PMID:
27731918
9.

Reliability, validity and feasibility of quality of life instruments for adult patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: result from a systematic review.

Yip WK, Mordiffi SZ, Ang E.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 Mar;10(1):27-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00252.x. Review.

PMID:
22405415
10.

[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].

Renou S, Hergueta T, Flament M, Mouren-Simeoni MC, Lecrubier Y.

Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. Review. French.

PMID:
15107714
11.

Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity.

Hamoen EH, De Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM.

Urol Oncol. 2015 Feb;33(2):69.e19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.005. Epub 2014 Jan 13. Review.

PMID:
24433753
12.

Feasibility of patient and peer surveys for Maintenance of Certification among diplomates of the American Board of Anesthesiology.

Warner DO, Sun H, Harman AE, Culley DJ.

J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

PMID:
25792177
13.

Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.

Elwyn G, Lewis M, Evans R, Hutchings H.

Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Sep;55(518):690-5.

14.

Assessment of radiology physicians by a regulatory authority.

Lockyer JM, Violato C, Fidler HM.

Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):771-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2473071431. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

PMID:
18375839
15.

Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria.

Lewis CC, Fischer S, Weiner BJ, Stanick C, Kim M, Martinez RG.

Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 4;10:155. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0342-x. Review.

16.

Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians: ...and our impact on one another is important.

Rubin IM, Fraser SW.

BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):171. No abstract available.

17.

A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease.

Huang H, Grant JA, Miller BS, Mirza FM, Gagnier JJ.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2572-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546514565096. Epub 2015 Jan 26. Review.

PMID:
25622986
18.

Assessment of impairment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Furlan JC, Noonan V, Singh A, Fehlings MG.

J Neurotrauma. 2011 Aug;28(8):1445-77. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1152. Epub 2010 Apr 6. Review.

19.

A systematic review of measurement properties of instruments assessing presenteeism.

Ospina MB, Dennett L, Waye A, Jacobs P, Thompson AH.

Am J Manag Care. 2015 Feb 1;21(2):e171-85. Review.

20.

Measuring the youth bullying experience: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of available instruments.

Vessey J, Strout TD, DiFazio RL, Walker A.

J Sch Health. 2014 Dec;84(12):819-43. doi: 10.1111/josh.12210. Review.

PMID:
25388599

Supplemental Content

Support Center