Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 409

1.

Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications.

Sigal-Zafrani B, Lewis JS, Clough KB, Vincent-Salomon A, Fourquet A, Meunier M, Falcou MC, Sastre-Garau X; Institut Curie Breast Study Group..

Mod Pathol. 2004 Jan;17(1):81-8.

2.

The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, Safaii H, Yunes M, Landa M, Chung M, Cady B, Wazer DE.

Cancer. 2002 Apr 1;94(7):1917-24.

3.

The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden.

Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, Ruthazer R, Kramer B, Safaii H, Graham R.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 May 1;38(2):291-9.

PMID:
9226315
4.

The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.

Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Ruthazer R, DiPetrillo T, Boyle T, Kanski J, Safaii H.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Nov 1;45(4):885-91.

PMID:
10571194
5.

Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions.

Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, Vang R, Tsangaris TN, Argani P.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Dec;29(12):1625-32.

PMID:
16327435
6.
7.

Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.

Sahoo S, Recant WM, Jaskowiak N, Tong L, Heimann R.

Breast J. 2005 Jul-Aug;11(4):242-7.

PMID:
15982389
8.

Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Caughran JL, Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Dekhne NS, Benitez PR, Goldstein NS.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov;16(11):3020-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0628-9.

PMID:
19636632
10.

Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.

Scopa CD, Aroukatos P, Tsamandas AC, Aletra C.

Breast J. 2006 Mar-Apr;12(2):150-3.

PMID:
16509840
11.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: size and resection volume predict margin status.

Melstrom LG, Melstrom KA, Wang EC, Pilewskie M, Winchester DJ.

Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct;33(5):438-42. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181b9cf31.

PMID:
20023569
12.

Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease.

Cheng L, Al-Kaisi NK, Gordon NH, Liu AY, Gebrail F, Shenk RR.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Sep 17;89(18):1356-60.

PMID:
9308705
13.

Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Dillon MF, Mc Dermott EW, O'Doherty A, Quinn CM, Hill AD, O'Higgins N.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 May;14(5):1618-28.

PMID:
17443388
14.

Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?

Valdes EK, Boolbol SK, Cohen JM, Feldman SM.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50.

PMID:
17206481
15.

Differences in the pathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast based on patient age.

Goldstein NS, Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Thomas M.

Cancer. 2000 Jun 1;88(11):2553-60.

PMID:
10861433
16.

The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.

Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, Sun P, Lickley HL, McCready DR, Holloway CM.

Breast J. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):331-7.

PMID:
16848842
18.
19.

A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.

Gibson GR, Lesnikoski BA, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ Jr.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 Oct;8(9):693-704.

PMID:
11597009
20.

Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study.

Benitez PR, Streeter O, Vicini F, Mehta V, Quiet C, Kuske R, Hayes MK, Arthur D, Kuerer H, Freedman G, Keisch M, Dipetrillo T, Khan D, Hudes R.

Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):427-33.

PMID:
16978943

Supplemental Content

Support Center