Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Human odor detectability: new methodology used to determine threshold and variation.

Walker JC, Hall SB, Walker DB, Kendal-Reed MS, Hood AF, Niu XF.

Chem Senses. 2003 Nov;28(9):817-26.

PMID:
14654450
2.

Determination of odor detection threshold in the Gottingen minipig.

Søndergaard LV, Holm IE, Herskin MS, Dagnæs-Hansen F, Johansen MG, Jørgensen AL, Ladewig J.

Chem Senses. 2010 Oct;35(8):727-34. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq076. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

3.
4.

Odor-Specific Loss of Smell Sensitivity with Age as Revealed by the Specific Sensitivity Test.

Seow YX, Ong PK, Huang D.

Chem Senses. 2016 Jul;41(6):487-95. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw051. Epub 2016 Mar 20.

PMID:
27001718
5.

Behavioral determination of olfactory thresholds to amyl acetate in dogs.

Krestel D, Passe D, Smith JC, Jonsson L.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1984 Summer;8(2):169-74.

PMID:
6462545
6.

Unconscious odor detection could not be due to odor itself.

Jacquot L, Monnin J, Brand G.

Brain Res. 2004 Mar 26;1002(1-2):51-4.

PMID:
14988033
7.

Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit.

Saito S, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Takashima Y, Gotow N, Naito N, Nozawa T, Mise M, Deguchi Y, Kobayakawa T.

Chem Senses. 2006 May;31(4):379-91. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

PMID:
16527871
8.

Assessment of olfactory function and androstenone odor thresholds in humans with or without functional occlusion of the vomeronasal duct.

Knecht M, Lundström JN, Witt M, Hüttenbrink KB, Heilmann S, Hummel T.

Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;117(6):1135-41.

PMID:
14674834
9.

Odorant exposure increases olfactory sensitivity: olfactory epithelium is implicated.

Yee KK, Wysocki CJ.

Physiol Behav. 2001 Apr;72(5):705-11.

PMID:
11337002
10.

Olfactory-evoked potentials: assessment of young and elderly, and comparison to psychophysical threshold.

Murphy C, Nordin S, de Wijk RA, Cain WS, Polich J.

Chem Senses. 1994 Feb;19(1):47-56.

PMID:
8055258
11.

Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.

Kendal-Reed M, Walker JC, Morgan WT, LaMacchio M, Lutz RW.

Chem Senses. 1998 Feb;23(1):71-82.

PMID:
9530972
12.

International comparison of odor threshold values of several odorants in Japan and in The Netherlands.

Hoshika Y, Imamura T, Muto G, Van Gemert LJ, Don JA, Walpot JI.

Environ Res. 1993 Apr;61(1):78-83.

PMID:
8472679
13.
14.

[Study on difference in olfactory response in dysosmia patients].

Shibuya E, Asahina N, Suzuki E, Suzaki H.

Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2002 Jul;105(7):783-9. Japanese.

PMID:
12174611
15.

Changes in the odor quality of androstadienone during exposure-induced sensitization.

Jacob TJ, Wang L, Jaffer S, McPhee S.

Chem Senses. 2006 Jan;31(1):3-8. Epub 2005 Nov 9.

PMID:
16280418
16.

Concentration and membrane fluidity dependence of odor discrimination in the turtle olfactory system.

Kashiwayanagi M, Sasaki K, Iida A, Saito H, Kurihara K.

Chem Senses. 1997 Oct;22(5):553-63.

PMID:
9363355
17.

Type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibition impairs detection of low odor concentrations in mice.

Pho V, Butman ML, Cherry JA.

Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jun 20;161(2):245-53.

PMID:
15922051
18.

Olfactory sensitivity of rats with transection of the lateral olfactory tract.

Slotnick BM, Schoonover FW.

Brain Res. 1993 Jul 9;616(1-2):132-7.

PMID:
8358604
19.

Assessing the relationship between concentrations of malodor compounds and odor scores from judges.

Greenman J, El-Maaytah M, Duffield J, Spencer P, Rosenberg M, Corry D, Saad S, Lenton P, Majerus G, Nachnani S.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jun;136(6):749-57.

PMID:
16022039
20.

Smell intensity monitoring using metal oxide semiconductor odor sensors during intravenous olfaction test.

Nakashima T, Kidera K, Miyazaki J, Kuratomi Y, Inokuchi A.

Chem Senses. 2006 Jan;31(1):43-7. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

PMID:
16322087

Supplemental Content

Support Center