Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 155

1.

Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring.

Russell EM, Bruce J, Krukowski ZH.

Br J Surg. 2003 May;90(5):527-32. Review.

PMID:
12734856
2.

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.

4.
5.

Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.

Morris JA Jr, Carrillo Y, Jenkins JM, Smith PW, Bledsoe S, Pichert J, White A.

Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2.

6.

The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: advancing surgical accountability.

Semmens JB, Aitken RJ, Sanfilippo FM, Mukhtar SA, Haynes NS, Mountain JA.

Med J Aust. 2005 Nov 21;183(10):504-8.

PMID:
16296962
7.

Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?

Herbert MA, Prince SL, Williams JL, Magee MJ, Mack MJ.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jun;77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5.

PMID:
15172246
8.

How accurate is a computerized surgical audit when resident medical staff collect the data?

Castleden WM, Norman PE, Stacey MC, McGechie D, Brooks JG, Fisher J, Lawrence-Brown MM.

Aust N Z J Surg. 1992 Jul;62(7):563-8.

PMID:
1610325
9.

Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates.

Guru V, Tu JV, Etchells E, Anderson GM, Naylor CD, Novick RJ, Feindel CM, Rubens FD, Teoh K, Mathur A, Hamilton A, Bonneau D, Cutrara C, Austin PC, Fremes SE.

Circulation. 2008 Jun 10;117(23):2969-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.722249.

10.

Effective audit: reporting to the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths.

Clark L, Doyle P, Duran E, Kishore P.

BMJ. 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1472-4.

11.
12.

An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome.

Committee for Scientific Affairs., Kazui T, Osada H, Fujita H.

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;55(12):483-92. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

PMID:
18066639
13.

Verification of data in congenital cardiac surgery.

Clarke DR, Breen LS, Jacobs ML, Franklin RC, Tobota Z, Maruszewski B, Jacobs JP.

Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:177-87. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002862.

PMID:
19063789
14.

Practicing surgeons lead in quality care, safety, and cost control.

Shively EH, Heine MJ, Schell RH, Sharpe JN, Garrison RN, Vallance SR, DeSimone KJ, Polk HC Jr.

Ann Surg. 2004 Jun;239(6):752-60; discussion 760-2.

15.

Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.

Hanauer DA, Englesbe MJ, Cowan JA Jr, Campbell DA.

J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan;208(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.030. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

PMID:
19228500
16.

Complete clinical outcomes audit. Resource requirements and validation of the instrument.

Hunter JG, Lyon C, Galloway K, Putterill M, van Rij A.

Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):699-704.

PMID:
10384078
17.

Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.

Steinberg SM, Popa MR, Michalek JA, Bethel MJ, Ellison EC.

Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.010.

PMID:
18847652
18.

Surgical mortality score: risk management tool for auditing surgical performance.

Hadjianastassiou VG, Tekkis PP, Poloniecki JD, Gavalas MC, Goldhill DR.

World J Surg. 2004 Feb;28(2):193-200. Epub 2004 Jan 8.

PMID:
14708049
19.

Audit of death certificates.

Beracochea E.

P N G Med J. 1995 Sep;38(3):191-7.

PMID:
9522858
20.

Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) for a surgical audit in elective digestive surgery.

Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H, Kimura O, Furuya T, Sameshima H, Ishikawa M.

Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):586-94.

PMID:
15179364

Supplemental Content

Support Center