Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 221

1.

Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Gourdier AL, Cornuz J, Perneger T, Perrier A.

Am J Med. 2002 Sep;113(4):269-75.

PMID:
12361811
2.

[Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].

Ulukavak Ciftçi T, Köktürk N, Demir N, Oğuzülgen KI, Ekim N.

Tuberk Toraks. 2005;53(3):252-8. Turkish.

PMID:
16258884
3.

Effect of patient location on the performance of clinical models to predict pulmonary embolism.

Ollenberger GP, Worsley DF.

Thromb Res. 2006;118(6):685-90. Epub 2005 Dec 27.

PMID:
16380153
4.

Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score.

Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):165-71.

PMID:
16461960
5.

Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;6(1):40-4. Epub 2007 Oct 29.

6.

External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Righini M, Bounameaux H.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Sep;10(5):345-9. Review.

PMID:
15316430
7.
8.

Performance of the Wells and Revised Geneva scores for predicting pulmonary embolism.

Calisir C, Yavas US, Ozkan IR, Alatas F, Cevik A, Ergun N, Sahin F.

Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;16(1):49-52. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328304ae6d.

PMID:
18931619
9.

Comparison of the Wells and Revised Geneva Scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an Australian experience.

Wong DD, Ramaseshan G, Mendelson RM.

Intern Med J. 2011 Mar;41(3):258-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02204.x.

PMID:
20214691
10.

Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2131-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2131.

PMID:
18955643
11.

Clinical prediction of pulmonary embolism in respiratory emergencies.

Tsimogianni AM, Rovina N, Porfyridis I, Nikoloutsou I, Roussos C, Zakynthinos SG, Stathopoulos GT.

Thromb Res. 2011 May;127(5):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

PMID:
21396683
12.

Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.

Donzé J, Le Gal G, Fine MJ, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Verschuren F, Cornuz J, Meyer G, Perrier A, Righini M, Aujesky D.

Thromb Haemost. 2008 Nov;100(5):943-8.

PMID:
18989542
13.

Prognostic models for selecting patients with acute pulmonary embolism for initial outpatient therapy.

Jiménez D, Yusen RD.

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008 Sep;14(5):414-21. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3283043e44. Review.

PMID:
18664971
14.

Comparison of the Wells score with the simplified revised Geneva score for assessing pretest probability of pulmonary embolism.

Penaloza A, Melot C, Motte S.

Thromb Res. 2011 Feb;127(2):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

PMID:
21094985
15.

VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.

PMID:
19404542
16.

Comparison of the unstructured clinician gestalt, the wells score, and the revised Geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Quentin-Georget S, Soulie C, Thys F, Roy PM.

Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;62(2):117-124.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

PMID:
23433653
18.

Performance and potential impact of a chest pain prediction rule in a large public hospital.

Reilly B, Durairaj L, Husain S, Acob C, Evans A, Hu TC, Das K, McNutt R.

Am J Med. 1999 Mar;106(3):285-91.

PMID:
10190376
19.

Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, Nendaz M, Perneger T, Bounameaux H, Perrier A, Righini M.

J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):957-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03801.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2. Review.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center