Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 71

1.
2.

The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development.

Pagliari C, Grimshaw J, Eccles M.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 May;7(2):165-73.

PMID:
11489041
5.

An observational study of health professionals' use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools.

Hutchinson AM, Johnston L.

J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2203-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x.

PMID:
18705739
6.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

7.

The role of group decision making processes in the creation of clinical guidelines.

Hopthrow T, Feder G, Michie S.

Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):358-64. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606539. Review.

PMID:
22026492
8.

[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].

Santiago-Delefosse M, Cahen F, Coeffin-Driol C.

Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305. French.

PMID:
14615699
9.

Towards multidisciplinary assessment of older people: exploring the change process.

Ross F, O'Tuathail C, Stubberfield D.

J Clin Nurs. 2005 Apr;14(4):518-29.

PMID:
15807760
10.

Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.

Gamroth L, Budgen C, Lougheed M.

Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14.

PMID:
19830923
11.
12.

Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline.

Hermens RP, Ouwens MM, Vonk-Okhuijsen SY, van der Wel Y, Tjan-Heijnen VC, van den Broek LD, Ho VK, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Groen HJ, Grol RP, Wollersheim HC.

Lung Cancer. 2006 Oct;54(1):117-24. Epub 2006 Aug 21.

PMID:
16920220
13.

Guideline attribute and implementation preferences among physicians in multiple health systems.

Stone TT, Schweikhart SB, Mantese A, Sonnad SS.

Qual Manag Health Care. 2005 Jul-Sep;14(3):177-87.

PMID:
16027596
14.

[The significance of clinical guidelines for rehabilitation].

Korsukéwitz C, Rose S, Schliehe F.

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Apr;42(2):67-73. German.

PMID:
12700999
15.

Clinical practice guidelines' development and use in New Zealand: an evolving process.

McKinlay E, McLeod D, Dowell A, Marshall C.

N Z Med J. 2004 Aug 6;117(1199):U999.

PMID:
15475982
16.

Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials.

Grant AM, Altman DG, Babiker AB, Campbell MK, Clemens FJ, Darbyshire JH, Elbourne DR, McLeer SK, Parmar MK, Pocock SJ, Spiegelhalter DJ, Sydes MR, Walker AE, Wallace SA; DAMOCLES study group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(7):1-238, iii-iv. Review.

17.

Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.

Green CJ, Fortin P, Maclure M, Macgregor A, Robinson S.

Int J Med Inform. 2006 Dec;75(12):818-28. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

PMID:
16920013
18.
19.

Evidence into practice: a theory based study of achieving national health targets in primary care.

Michie S, Hendy J, Smith J, Adshead F.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):447-56.

PMID:
15304145
20.

Development of clinical practice guidelines: evaluation of 2 methods.

van der Sanden WJ, Mettes DG, Plasschaert AJ, Grol RP, Verdonschot EH.

J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 May;70(5):301.

Supplemental Content

Support Center