Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 82

1.

Varieties of centralized intake: the Portland Target Cities Project experience.

Barron N, McFarland BH, McCamant L.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 Jan-Mar;34(1):75-86.

PMID:
12003117
2.

Problems in the application of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) in rural substance abuse services.

Wertz JS, Cleaveland BL, Stephens RS.

J Subst Abuse. 1995;7(2):175-88.

PMID:
7580228
3.

Does centralized intake improve drug abuse treatment outcomes?

Guydish J, Woods WJ, Davis T, Bostrom A, Frazier Y.

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Jun;20(4):265-73; discussion 275-6.

PMID:
11672641
4.

Evaluation of full vs. partial continuum of care in the treatment of publicly funded substance abusers in Washington State.

McKay JR, Donovan DM, McLellan T, Krupski A, Hansten M, Stark KD, Geary K, Cecere J.

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2002;28(2):307-38.

PMID:
12014818
5.

Interaction effects of treatment setting and client characteristics on retention and completion.

Klein C, di Menza S, Arfken C, Schuster CR.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 Jan-Mar;34(1):39-50.

PMID:
12003112
6.

The San Francisco centralized intake unit: a description of participants and service episodes.

Woods WJ, Klingemann SD, Guydish JR.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 Jan-Mar;34(1):17-24.

8.

Effects of treatment history and centralized intake on drug treatment outcomes.

Sears C, Davis T, Guydish J.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 Jan-Mar;34(1):87-95.

9.

Impact of centralized intake on drug and alcohol treatment placement decisions.

Scott CK, Foss MA.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 Jan-Mar;34(1):7-15.

PMID:
12003116
10.

The Addiction Severity Index medical and psychiatric composite scores measure similar domains as the SF-36 in substance-dependent veterans: concurrent and discriminant validity.

Calsyn DA, Saxon AJ, Bush KR, Howell DN, Baer JS, Sloan KL, Malte CA, Kivlahan DR.

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Nov 11;76(2):165-71.

PMID:
15488340
11.

Improving substance abuse treatment for indigent clients in Detroit.

Zold-Kilbourn P, Tucker TC, Berry J.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 1999 Jul-Sep;31(3):233-9.

PMID:
10533969
12.
13.

Treatment career snapshots: profiles of first treatment and previous treatment clients.

Claus RE, Mannen RK, Schicht WW.

Addict Behav. 1999 Jul-Aug;24(4):471-9.

PMID:
10466843
14.

Effect of centralized intake on outcomes of substance abuse treatment.

Rohrer JE, Vaughan MS, Cadoret RJ, Carswell C, Patterson A, Zwick J.

Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Nov;47(11):1233-8.

PMID:
8916242
15.

Gender differences in dually-diagnosed clients receiving chemical dependency treatment.

DiNitto DM, Webb DK, Rubin A.

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 Jan-Mar;34(1):105-17.

PMID:
12003108
16.
17.

Mothers in substance abuse treatment: differences in characteristics based on involvement with child welfare services.

Grella CE, Hser YI, Huang YC.

Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Jan;30(1):55-73. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

PMID:
16406024
18.

Clinical and reliable change in an Australian residential substance use program using the Addiction Severity Index.

Deane FP, Kelly PJ, Crowe TP, Coulson JC, Lyons GC.

J Addict Dis. 2013;32(2):194-205. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2013.795470.

PMID:
23815426
19.

Contrasting jail diversion and in-jail services for mental illness and substance abuse: do they serve the same clients?

Draine J, Blank A, Kottsieper P, Solomon P.

Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):171-81.

PMID:
15818608
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center