Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research.

Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I.

Behav Brain Res. 2001 Nov 1;125(1-2):279-84.

PMID:
11682119
2.

Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.

Pawluk-Kołc M, Zieba-Palus J, Parczewski A.

Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Jun 27;160(1):53-8. Epub 2005 Oct 10.

PMID:
16221535
3.

Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.

Reiner A, Yekutieli D, Benjamini Y.

Bioinformatics. 2003 Feb 12;19(3):368-75.

PMID:
12584122
4.
5.

Quantitative trait Loci analysis using the false discovery rate.

Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D.

Genetics. 2005 Oct;171(2):783-90. Epub 2005 Jun 14.

6.
7.

Wavelet thresholding with bayesian false discovery rate control.

Tadesse MG, Ibrahim JG, Vannucci M, Gentleman R.

Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):25-35.

PMID:
15737075
8.

Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.

Hsueh HM, Chen JJ, Kodell RL.

J Biopharm Stat. 2003 Nov;13(4):675-89.

PMID:
14584715
9.

On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.

Green GH, Diggle PJ.

Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2007;6:Article27. Epub 2007 Oct 11.

PMID:
18052910
10.

Using alpha wisely: improving power to detect multiple QTL.

Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM.

Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article1. Epub 2004 Feb 12.

PMID:
16646787
11.

Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.

Langers DR, Jansen JF, Backes WH.

Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 15;38(1):43-56. Epub 2007 Aug 8. Erratum in: Neuroimage. 2008 May 1;40(4):1930.

PMID:
17825583
12.

Exploring the false discovery rate in multichannel NIRS.

Singh AK, Dan I.

Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):542-9. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

PMID:
16959498
13.

An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.

Lin D, Shkedy Z, Burzykowski T, Ion R, Göhlmann HW, Bondt AD, Perer T, Geerts T, Van den Wyngaert I, Bijnens L.

Biom J. 2008 Oct;50(5):801-23. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710467.

PMID:
18932139
14.
15.

Controlling the rate of Type I error over a large set of statistical tests.

Keselman HJ, Cribbie R, Holland B.

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2002 May;55(Pt 1):27-39.

PMID:
12034010
16.

Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests.

Fernando RL, Nettleton D, Southey BR, Dekkers JC, Rothschild MF, Soller M.

Genetics. 2004 Jan;166(1):611-9.

17.

Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.

Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T.

Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):870-8.

PMID:
11906227
19.

Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.

Senn S, Bretz F.

Pharm Stat. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):161-70.

PMID:
17674404
20.

Controlling false discoveries in genetic studies.

van den Oord EJ.

Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008 Jul 5;147B(5):637-44. Review.

PMID:
18092307

Supplemental Content

Support Center